Literature DB >> 11538844

Microbial biomass and productivity in seagrass beds.

D J Moriarty1, P I Boon, J A Hansen, W G Hunt, I R Poiner, P C Pollard, G W Skyring, D C White.   

Abstract

Different methods for measuring the rates of processes mediated by bacteria in sediments and the rates of bacterial cell production have been compared. In addition, net production of the seagrass Zostera capricorni and bacterial production have been compared and some interrelationships with the nitrogen cycle discussed. Seagrass productivity was estimated by measuring the plastochrone interval using a leaf stapling technique. The average productivity over four seasons was 1.28 +/- 0.28 g C m-2 day-1 (mean +/- standard deviation, n = 4). Bacterial productivity was measured five times throughout a year using the rate of tritiated thymidine incorporated into DNA. Average values were 33 +/- 12 mg C m-2 day-1 for sediment and 23 +/- 4 for water column (n = 5). Spatial variability between samples was greater than seasonal variation for both seagrass productivity and bacterial productivity. On one occasion, bacterial productivity was measured using the rate of 32P incorporated into phospholipid. The values were comparable to those obtained with tritiated thymidine. The rate of sulfate reduction was 10 mmol SO4(-2) m-2 day-1. The rate of methanogenesis was low, being 5.6 mg CH4 produced m-2 day-1. A comparison of C flux measured using rates of sulfate reduction and DNA synthesis indicated that anaerobic processes were predominant in these sediments. An analysis of microbial biomass and community structure, using techniques of phospholipid analysis, showed that bacteria were predominant members of the microbial biomass and that of these, strictly anaerobic bacteria were the main components. Ammonia concentration in interstitial water varied from 23 to 71 micromoles. Estimates of the amount of ammonia required by seagrass showed that the ammonia would turn over about once per day. Rapid recycling of nitrogen by bacteria and bacterial grazers is probably important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Life Support Systems; NASA Discipline Number 61-10; NASA Program CELSS; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 11538844     DOI: 10.1080/01490458509385919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geomicrobiol J        ISSN: 0149-0451            Impact factor:   2.308


  10 in total

1.  Seasonal changes in numbers and the location of a particular bacterial strain of Alteromonas sp. in seagrass sediments.

Authors:  P W Glazebrook; G Moriarty; A C Hayward; I C Macrae
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Efficacy of phospholipid analysis in determining microbial biomass in sediments.

Authors:  R H Findlay; G M King; L Watling
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Factors controlling bacterial production in marine and freshwater sediments.

Authors:  B C Sander; J Kalff
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Nitrogen fixation in sediments and the rhizosphere of the seagrassZostera capricorni.

Authors:  M J O'Donohue; D J Moriarty; I C Rae
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Bacterial production in freshwater sediments: Cell specific versus system measures.

Authors:  R D Fallon; C W Boylen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Influence of the root system of the Common Osier (Salix viminalis L.) on abundance of heterotrophic bacteria in the willow sewage treatment system.

Authors:  Elzbieta Lalke-Porczyk; Maria Swiontek Brzezinska; Wojciech Donderski
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Phospholipid profiling of sediments using phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  L G Bardygula-Nonn; J L Kaster; T Glonek
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.880

8.  Influence of Human Activities on Broad-Scale Estuarine-Marine Habitats Using Omics-Based Approaches Applied to Marine Sediments.

Authors:  Rohan M Shah; Joseph Crosswell; Suzanne S Metcalfe; Geoffrey Carlin; Paul D Morrison; Avinash V Karpe; Enzo A Palombo; Andy D L Steven; David J Beale
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-10-04

9.  The greenhouse gas offset potential from seagrass restoration.

Authors:  Matthew P J Oreska; Karen J McGlathery; Lillian R Aoki; Amélie C Berger; Peter Berg; Lindsay Mullins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The Seagrass Holobiont and Its Microbiome.

Authors:  Kelly Ugarelli; Seemanti Chakrabarti; Peeter Laas; Ulrich Stingl
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-12-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.