Literature DB >> 17597940

Sagittal lumbar spine position during standing, walking, and running at various gradients.

David Levine1, Marisa A Colston, Michael W Whittle, Elizabeth C Pharo, Denis J Marcellin-Little.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Motion in the lumbar spine during certain physical activities may exceed tissue homeostasis, leading to low back pain. Previous authors have assessed sagittal motion of the lumbar spine during walking; however, limited attention has been focused on changes in spine position with walking or running on different surface gradients.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate lumbar spine sagittal position during standing, walking, and running on level, uphill, and downhill surfaces.
DESIGN: Three by three and 2 x 3 (activity by gradient) within-subjects design with repeated measures on both factors.
SETTING: Motion analysis laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twenty healthy women (age = 23.4 +/- 2.2 years, height = 141.5 +/- 7.5 cm, mass = 60.5 +/- 5.9 kg) with no history of low back pain or surgery or lower extremity impairments or surgery. INTERVENTION(S): Subjects stood motionless, walked at 1.3 m/s, and ran at 2.9 m/s on a treadmill under 3 conditions: level, uphill at 5 degrees, and downhill at 5 degrees. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We measured lumbar spine position and total lumbar range of motion in the sagittal plane using an infrared motion analysis system, with markers affixed to the skin over the sacrum and thoracolumbar junction.
RESULTS: The average lumbar spine position, for both walking and running, was smallest uphill and greatest downhill. On all 3 gradients, the sagittal range of motion (flexion-extension) was greater when running than when walking.
CONCLUSIONS: For each of the surface gradients, the average lumbar spine position was greatest during standing, at an intermediate value during running, and smallest during walking. Changes in lumbar spine position corresponding to different activities and different surface gradients are important considerations when rehabilitating patients with lumbar spine conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17597940      PMCID: PMC1896074     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex.

Authors:  A G Schache; P D Blanch; D A Rath; T V Wrigley; R Starr; K L Bennell
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Exercise and arthritis. Exercise and the back.

Authors:  W Liemohn
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Survey of competitive distance runners in Alberta: satisfaction with health care services with respect to running injuries.

Authors:  E O Rendall; N G Mohtadi
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 4.  Biomechanical considerations for clinical application in athletes with low back pain.

Authors:  R H Deusinger
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.182

5.  Force actions in the human trunk during running.

Authors:  A Cappozzo
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Running symposium.

Authors:  R A Mann; D E Baxter; L D Lutter
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1981-01

7.  The effects of pelvic movement on lumbar lordosis in the standing position.

Authors:  D Levine; M W Whittle
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Spine injuries in runners: A functional approach.

Authors:  A J Cole; S A Herring; S A Stratton; J Narvaez
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 1.398

9.  Biomechanical aspects of lumbar spine injuries in athletes: a review.

Authors:  M J Alexander
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1985-03

10.  Herniated lumbar disk associated with running. A review of 10 cases.

Authors:  G Guten
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of a novel measurement tool to assess lumbar spine posture and range of motion.

Authors:  Tobias Consmüller; Antonius Rohlmann; Daniel Weinland; Claudia Druschel; Georg N Duda; William R Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Downhill running impairs peripheral but not central neuromuscular indices in elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Xin Ye; Robert J Benton; William M Miller; Sunggun Jeon; Jun Seob Song
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-03-23

3.  Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device.

Authors:  Roman Michalik; Juliane Hamm; Valentin Quack; Jörg Eschweiler; Matthias Gatz; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.