Literature DB >> 11535345

Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients.

M O Heller1, G Bergmann, G Deuretzbacher, L Claes, N P Haas, G N Duda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the loading of the proximal femur during daily activities and to quantify the influence of femoral anteversion.
DESIGN: This study combined experimental and analytical approaches to determine the in vivo loading at the hip joint. A numerical musculo-skeletal model was validated against measured in vivo hip contact forces and then used to analyse the influence of anteversion on the loading conditions in the femur.
BACKGROUND: Musculo-skeletal loading of long bones is essential for joint replacement and fracture healing. Although joint contact forces have previously been measured in selected patients, the interaction between femoral anteversion and the associated musculo-skeletal loading environment remains unknown.
METHODS: The gait of four patients with force measuring hip prostheses was analysed during walking and stair-climbing. Musculo-skeletal loading was determined using individual numerical models by minimising the sum of the muscle forces.
RESULTS: Experimentally and numerically determined hip contact forces agreed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Muscle activity resulted in compression of the femur and small shear forces in the meta- and epi-physeal regions. Increasing the anteversion to an angle of 30 degrees increased hip contact forces and bending moments up to 28%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that femoral anteversion has a strong influence on the musculo-skeletal loading environment in the proximal femur. RELEVANCE: Detailed musculo-skeletal modelling may allow pre-surgical, patient specific optimisation of loading on implant, bone and soft tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11535345     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00053-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  20 in total

1.  Hip joint contact forces during stumbling.

Authors:  G Bergmann; F Graichen; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Seung Hoon Oh; Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Taek Rim Yoon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  [Musculoskeletal load analysis. A biomechanical explanation for clinical results--and more?].

Authors:  M O Heller; J H Schröder; G Matziolis; A Sharenkov; W R Taylor; C Perka; G N Duda
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Hip joint center localisation: A biomechanical application to hip arthroplasty population.

Authors:  Vicky Bouffard; Mickael Begon; Annick Champagne; Payam Farhadnia; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; François Prince
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

5.  Design of an Affordable, Modular Implant Device for Soft Tissue Tension Assessment and Range of Motion Tracking During Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan C J Wei; Bryan Blaauw; Dieter G M Van Der Pol; Mauricio Cruz Saldivar; Chung-Feng Lai; Jenny Dankelman; Tim Horeman
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2022-05-12

6.  The impact of hip implant alignment on muscle and joint loading during dynamic activities.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Peter J Laz; Kevin B Shelburne; Dana L Judd; Daniel N Huff; Joshua D Winters; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  [On the biomechanics of the hip: relevance of femoral anteversion for hip contact force and loading using a short-stemmed prostheses].

Authors:  S W Tohtz; M O Heller; W R Taylor; C Perka; G N Duda
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Analysis of hip joint loading during walking with different shoe types using instrumented total hip prostheses.

Authors:  Y Palmowski; S Popović; D Kosack; P Damm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Influence of prosthesis design and implantation technique on implant stresses after cementless revision THR.

Authors:  Markus O Heller; Manav Mehta; William R Taylor; Dong-Yeong Kim; Andrew Speirs; Georg N Duda; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  On the 3D Nature of the Magpie (Aves: Pica pica) Functional Hindlimb Anatomy During the Take-Off Jump.

Authors:  E A Meilak; N J Gostling; C Palmer; M O Heller
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.