OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on gastric mucosal-arterial PCO2 gradients. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Intensive care unit in a university clinic. PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The physician in charge indicated the turning manoeuver for the individual patient. MEASUREMENTS/ RESULTS: In addition to routine measurements of global hemodynamics and gas exchange we determined: 1) intragastric pressure; and 2) gastric mucosal-arterial PCO2 difference. After a baseline measurement in the supine position patients were turned to the prone position. After 60', 120', a median of 6.5 h (2-10 h) in the prone position, and again after 60' in the supine position, all measurements were repeated. Global hemodynamics remained unaltered throughout the study. While gastric mucosal-arterial PCO2 gradients did not change significantly during the first 60 min in the prone position, they significantly increased during the following 60 min [median/percentile: baseline: 6 (1 to -3); 60': 7 (15-5); 120': 13 (20-8) mmHg]. The median intragastric pressure was not significantly affected [baseline: 10 (13-5); 60': 12 (16-8); 120': 11 (13-7) mmHg], but 9 of the 11 patients in whom intragastric pressure increased during the first 60 min in the prone position also showed significantly increased PCO2 gradients (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Mechanical ventilation in the prone position may be affiliated with increased tonometric gastric mucosal-arterial PCO2 gradients depending on the effect on intraabdominal pressure. Measuring intraabdominal pressure and/or gastric mucosal PCO2 via a nasogastric tube therefore may help to detect adverse effects of this ventilatory strategy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on gastric mucosal-arterial PCO2 gradients. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Intensive care unit in a university clinic. PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The physician in charge indicated the turning manoeuver for the individual patient. MEASUREMENTS/ RESULTS: In addition to routine measurements of global hemodynamics and gas exchange we determined: 1) intragastric pressure; and 2) gastric mucosal-arterial PCO2 difference. After a baseline measurement in the supine position patients were turned to the prone position. After 60', 120', a median of 6.5 h (2-10 h) in the prone position, and again after 60' in the supine position, all measurements were repeated. Global hemodynamics remained unaltered throughout the study. While gastric mucosal-arterial PCO2 gradients did not change significantly during the first 60 min in the prone position, they significantly increased during the following 60 min [median/percentile: baseline: 6 (1 to -3); 60': 7 (15-5); 120': 13 (20-8) mmHg]. The median intragastric pressure was not significantly affected [baseline: 10 (13-5); 60': 12 (16-8); 120': 11 (13-7) mmHg], but 9 of the 11 patients in whom intragastric pressure increased during the first 60 min in the prone position also showed significantly increased PCO2 gradients (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Mechanical ventilation in the prone position may be affiliated with increased tonometric gastric mucosal-arterial PCO2 gradients depending on the effect on intraabdominal pressure. Measuring intraabdominal pressure and/or gastric mucosal PCO2 via a nasogastric tube therefore may help to detect adverse effects of this ventilatory strategy.
Authors: Stephan M Jakob; Rafael Knuesel; Jyrki J Tenhunen; Richard Pradl; Jukka Takala Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2010-07-04 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Paolo Pelosi; Jan J De Waele; Manu Lng Malbrain; Chad G Ball; Maureen O Meade; Henry T Stelfox; Kevin B Laupland Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Pierre Michelet; Antoine Roch; Marc Gainnier; Jean-Marie Sainty; Jean-Pierre Auffray; Laurent Papazian Journal: Crit Care Date: 2005-03-31 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Thomas Weig; Mirjam I Schubert; Norbert Gruener; Michael E Dolch; Lorenz Frey; Jens Miller; Thorsten Johnson; Michael Irlbeck Journal: Eur J Med Res Date: 2012-12-22 Impact factor: 2.175
Authors: Th Bein; M Bischoff; U Brückner; K Gebhardt; D Henzler; C Hermes; K Lewandowski; M Max; M Nothacker; Th Staudinger; M Tryba; S Weber-Carstens; H Wrigge Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 1.041