Literature DB >> 19242675

What is normal intra-abdominal pressure and how is it affected by positioning, body mass and positive end-expiratory pressure?

B L De Keulenaer1, J J De Waele, B Powell, M L N G Malbrain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe what is defined as normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and how body positioning, body mass index (BMI) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) affect IAP monitoring.
METHODS: A review of different databases was made (Pubmed, MEDLINE (January 1966-June 2007) and EMBASE.com (January 1966-June 2007)) using the search terms of "IAP", "intra-abdominal hypertension" (IAH), "abdominal compartment syndrome" (ACS), "body positioning", "prone positioning", "PEEP" and "acute respiratory distress syndrome" (ARDS). Prior to 1966, we selected older articles by looking at the reference lists displayed in the more recent papers.
RESULTS: This review focuses on the concept that the abdomen truly behaves as a hydraulic system. The definitions of a normal IAP in the general patient population and morbidly obese patients are reviewed. Subsequently, factors that affect the accuracy of IAP monitoring, i.e., body position (head of bed elevation, lateral decubitus and prone position) and PEEP, are explored.
CONCLUSION: The abdomen behaves as a hydraulic system with a normal IAP of about 5-7 mmHg, and with higher baseline levels in morbidly obese patients of about 9-14 mmHg. Measuring IAP via the bladder in the supine position is still the accepted standard method, but in patients in the semi-recumbent position (head of the bed elevated to 30 degrees and 45 degrees ), the IAP on average is 4 and 9 mmHg, respectively, higher. Future research should be focused on developing and validating predictive equations to correct for supine IAP towards the semi-recumbent position. Small increases in IAP in stable patients without IAH, turned prone, have no detrimental effects. The role of prone positioning in the unstable patient with or without IAH still needs to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19242675     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1445-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  48 in total

1.  The nature of intraperitoneal and intrarectal pressures.

Authors:  R F RUSHMER
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1946-10

2.  Effects of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions.

Authors:  M Takata; R A Wise; J L Robotham
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-12

3.  The pressures developed in abdomen and thorax during the Flack tests.

Authors:  J N MILLS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1950-10-16       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  A simple technique to accurately determine intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  T J Iberti; K M Kelly; D R Gentili; S Hirsch; E Benjamin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Regional differences in abdominal pressure swings in dogs.

Authors:  M Decramer; A De Troyer; S Kelly; L Zocchi; P T Macklem
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-12

6.  Iliofemoral venous pressure correlates with intraabdominal pressure in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Berndt Arfvidsson; Bo Eklof; John Balfour
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.089

Review 7.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Jean Chastre; Jean-Yves Fagon
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Impact of carbon dioxide and helium insufflation on cardiorespiratory function during prolonged pneumoperitoneum in an experimental rat model.

Authors:  E J Hazebroek; J J Haitsma; B Lachmann; E W Steyerberg; R W F de Bruin; N D Bouvy; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration.

Authors:  I L Kron; P K Harman; S P Nolan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia: from epidemiology to patient management.

Authors:  Marc J M Bonten; Marin H Kollef; Jesse B Hall
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  73 in total

1.  [Short version S2e guidelines: "Positioning therapy and early mobilization for prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary function disorders"].

Authors:  T Bein; M Bischoff; U Brückner; K Gebhardt; D Henzler; C Hermes; K Lewandowski; M Max; M Nothacker; T Staudinger; M Tryba; S Weber-Carstens; H Wrigge
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Do we need to know body anthropomorphic data whilst measuring abdominal pressure?

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Inneke De Laet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Why we need guidelines and recommendations for research on intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Inneke De Laet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Esophageal pressures in acute lung injury: do they represent artifact or useful information about transpulmonary pressure, chest wall mechanics, and lung stress?

Authors:  Stephen H Loring; Carl R O'Donnell; Negin Behazin; Atul Malhotra; Todd Sarge; Ray Ritz; Victor Novack; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-12-17

5.  Increasing abdominal pressure with and without PEEP: effects on intra-peritoneal, intra-organ and intra-vascular pressures.

Authors:  Stephan M Jakob; Rafael Knuesel; Jyrki J Tenhunen; Richard Pradl; Jukka Takala
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Clinical review: Intra-abdominal hypertension: does it influence the physiology of prone ventilation?

Authors:  Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Paolo Pelosi; Jan J De Waele; Manu Lng Malbrain; Chad G Ball; Maureen O Meade; Henry T Stelfox; Kevin B Laupland
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Daniel Verzilli; Jean-Michel Constantin; Mustapha Sebbane; Gérald Chanques; Boris Jung; Pierre-François Perrigault; Manu Malbrain; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2009. Part III: mechanical ventilation, acute lung injury and respiratory distress syndrome, pediatrics, ethics, and miscellanea.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory function and hemodynamics in patients with acute respiratory failure with and without intra-abdominal hypertension: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joerg Krebs; Paolo Pelosi; Charalambos Tsagogiorgas; Markus Alb; Thomas Luecke
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures.

Authors:  Stefano Batacchi; Stefania Matano; Alessandra Nella; Giovanni Zagli; Manuela Bonizzoli; Andrea Pasquini; Valentina Anichini; Valentina Tucci; Giuseppe Manca; Kevin Ban; Andrea Valeri; Adriano Peris
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.