C Guerin1, L Baboi, J C Richard. 1. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de la croix-rousse, CHU de Lyon, Bâtiment R, 2ème étage, 103 Grande rue de la croix-rousse, 69004, Lyon, France, claude.guerin@chu-lyon.fr.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Prone positioning has been used for many years in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The initial reason for prone positioning in ARDS patients was improvement in oxygenation. It was later shown that mechanical ventilation in the prone position can be less injurious to the lung and hence the primary reason to use prone positioning is prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A large body of physiologic benefits of prone positioning in ARDS patients accumulated but these failed to translate into clinical benefits. More recently, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trial in a specific subgroup of ARDS patients demonstrated that prone positioning can improve survival. This review covers the effects of prone positioning on oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, and VILI. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude with the effects of prone positioning on patient outcome, in particular on survival.
INTRODUCTION: Prone positioning has been used for many years in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The initial reason for prone positioning in ARDSpatients was improvement in oxygenation. It was later shown that mechanical ventilation in the prone position can be less injurious to the lung and hence the primary reason to use prone positioning is prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A large body of physiologic benefits of prone positioning in ARDSpatients accumulated but these failed to translate into clinical benefits. More recently, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trial in a specific subgroup of ARDSpatients demonstrated that prone positioning can improve survival. This review covers the effects of prone positioning on oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, and VILI. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude with the effects of prone positioning on patient outcome, in particular on survival.
Authors: Salvatore Grasso; Tania Stripoli; Marianna Sacchi; Paolo Trerotoli; Francesco Staffieri; Delia Franchini; Valentina De Monte; Valerio Valentini; Paolo Pugliese; Antonio Crovace; Bernd Driessen; Tommaso Fiore Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-06-19 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: L Papazian; F Bregeon; F Gaillat; X Thirion; M Gainnier; R Gregoire; P Saux; F Gouin; Y Jammes; J P Auffray Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sachin Sud; Jan O Friedrich; Paolo Taccone; Federico Polli; Neill K J Adhikari; Roberto Latini; Antonio Pesenti; Claude Guérin; Jordi Mancebo; Martha A Q Curley; Rafael Fernandez; Ming-Cheng Chan; Pascal Beuret; Gregor Voggenreiter; Maneesh Sud; Gianni Tognoni; Luciano Gattinoni Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Cyril Charron; Vincent Caille; Guillaume Belliard; Bernard Page; François Jardin Journal: Chest Date: 2007-10-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: T Bein; M Bischoff; U Brückner; K Gebhardt; D Henzler; C Hermes; K Lewandowski; M Max; M Nothacker; T Staudinger; M Tryba; S Weber-Carstens; H Wrigge Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 1.041