Literature DB >> 11527432

Some attractions of verb agreement.

K Bock1, K M Eberhard, J C Cutting, A S Meyer, H Schriefers.   

Abstract

In English, words like scissors are grammatically plural but conceptually singular, while words like suds are both grammatically and conceptually plural. Words like army can be construed plurally, despite being grammatically singular. To explore whether and how congruence between grammatical and conceptual number affected the production of subject-verb number agreement in English, we elicited sentence completions for complex subject noun phrases like The advertisement for the scissors. In these phrases, singular subject nouns were followed by distractor words whose grammatical and conceptual numbers varied. The incidence of plural attraction (the use of plural verbs after plural distractors) increased only when distractors were grammatically plural, and revealed no influence from the distractors' number meanings. Companion experiments in Dutch offered converging support for this account and suggested that similar agreement processes operate in that language. The findings argue for a component of agreement that is sensitive primarily to the grammatical reflections of number. Together with other results, the evidence indicates that the implementation of agreement in languages like English and Dutch involves separable processes of number marking and number morphing, in which number meaning plays different parts. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11527432     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement.

Authors:  Robert J Hartsuiker; Herbert J Schriefers; Kathryn Bock; Gerdien M Kikstra
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

2.  Subject-verb agreement in children and adults: serial or hierarchical processing?

Authors:  Isabelle Negro; Lucile Chanquoy; Michel Fayol; Maryse Louis-Sidney
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-05

3.  Notional number agreement in English.

Authors:  Karin R Humphreys; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

4.  Processing modifier-head agreement in reading: evidence for a delayed effect of agreement.

Authors:  Seppo Vainio; Jukkä Hyöna; Anneli Pajunen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

5.  Gender bender: gender errors in L2 pronoun production.

Authors:  Inés Antón-Méndez
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-04

6.  Where does gender come from? Evidence from a complex inflectional system.

Authors:  Jelena Mirković; Maryellen C MacDonald; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2005

7.  Resolving Conflicts in Natural and Grammatical Gender Agreement: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Maya Dank; Avital Deutsch; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-08

8.  Hierarchical structure and memory mechanisms in agreement attraction.

Authors:  Julie Franck; Matthew Wagers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production.

Authors:  Maureen Gillespie; Neal J Pearlmutter
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11-27

10.  When Singular and Plural are Both Grammatical: Semantic and Morphophonological Effects in Agreement.

Authors:  Jelena Mirković; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.