Literature DB >> 11523076

Paradigm shifts in clinical trials enabled by information technology.

R G Marks1, M Conlon, S J Ruberg.   

Abstract

The use of the world wide web for clinical trials changes the processes of performing clinical research in several fundamental ways. Greatly improved security, monitoring capability, and accuracy and timeliness of study conduct can be achieved while lowering cost. Data quality is enhanced while co-ordinating centre effort is reduced. The web provides a natural environment for linking the various components of clinical research, leading to new levels of simplicity and efficiency. It also enhances opportunities for recruitment of study investigators and patients. Other information technology tools and databases can be used to assist in this regard as well. Web-based trials change the relationship of the investigator site to the study and the site to the co-ordinating centre. Different roles and responsibilities lead to simplified processes and more and higher quality data. Many standard co-ordinating centre activities, such as randomization, protocol implementation and amending, document tracking, adverse event reporting, site monitoring, report generation and data analysis are all fundamentally changed in a web-based trial. Opportunities are enhanced to identify potential investigators and support their successful study conduct. As the role of investigator sites is changed in web-based research, more primary care medical providers can be attracted to research, providing more typical patients to studies than those sometimes available through more traditional research sites, especially those at academic study sites. Other activities can now be co-ordinated electronically with the advent of the web. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) can use online tools to control investigator participation, resulting in improved study efficiency and patient safety. A web-based research pharmacy provides tremendous efficiencies in managing and distributing study medications. Financial payments to the sites can be performed and recorded electronically, or even administered based on timeliness and quality of the data. Our early experience with web-based trials indicates that there can be tremendous gains in study efficiency and accuracy by restructuring processes, roles and responsibilities through a comprehensive centralized, web-based trial. The future appears bright for web-based clinical trials. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523076     DOI: 10.1002/sim.736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  Coordination and management of multicenter clinical studies in trauma: Experience from the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) Study.

Authors:  Mohammad H Rahbar; Erin E Fox; Deborah J del Junco; Bryan A Cotton; Jeanette M Podbielski; Nena Matijevic; Mitchell J Cohen; Martin A Schreiber; Jiajie Zhang; Parsa Mirhaji; Sarah J Duran; Robert J Reynolds; Ruby Benjamin-Garner; John B Holcomb
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Clinical research subject recruitment: the Volunteer for Vanderbilt Research Program www.volunteer.mc.vanderbilt.edu.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Lynda Lane; Italo Biaggioni
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  An informatics blueprint for healthcare quality information systems.

Authors:  Joyce C Niland; Layla Rouse; Douglas C Stahl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  A knowledge-anchored integrative image search and retrieval system.

Authors:  Selnur Erdal; Umit V Catalyurek; Philip R O Payne; Joel Saltz; Jyoti Kamal; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Meeting practical challenges of a trial involving a multitude of treatment regimens: an example of a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial in neuroAIDS.

Authors:  Susanne May; Scott Letendre; Richard Haubrich; J Allen McCutchan; Robert Heaton; Edmund Capparelli; Ronald Ellis
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Modeling participant-related clinical research events using conceptual knowledge acquisition techniques.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Eneida A Mendonca; Justin B Starren
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 7.  Using e-technologies in clinical trials.

Authors:  Carmen Rosa; Aimee N C Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Meg Brunner; Erin L Winstanley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Heterogeneity prevails: the state of clinical trial data management in Europe - results of a survey of ECRIN centres.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kuchinke; Christian Ohmann; Qin Yang; Nader Salas; Jens Lauritsen; Francois Gueyffier; Alan Leizorovicz; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Michael Wittenberg; Zoltán Voko; Siobhan Gaynor; Margaret Cooney; Peter Doran; Aldo Maggioni; Andrea Lorimer; Ferràn Torres; Gladys McPherson; Jim Charwill; Mats Hellström; Stéphane Lejeune
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Participation of a coordinating center pharmacy in a multicenter international study.

Authors:  Jihyun Esther Jeon; Janet Mighty; Karen Lane; Nichol McBee; Ryan Majkowski; Steven Mayo; Daniel Hanley
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 10.  Glioma diagnostics and biomarkers: an ongoing challenge in the field of medicine and science.

Authors:  Fred H Hochberg; Nadia A Atai; David Gonda; Michael S Hughes; Brolin Mawejje; Leonora Balaj; Robert S Carter
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.