Literature DB >> 11523075

The continual reassessment method and its applications: a Bayesian methodology for phase I cancer clinical trials.

N Ishizuka1, Y Ohashi.   

Abstract

We discuss the continual reassessment method (CRM) and its extension with practical applications in phase I and I/II cancer clinical trials. The CRM has been proposed as an alternative design of a traditional cohort design and its essential features are the sequential (continual) selection of a dose level for the next patients based on the dose-toxicity relationship and the updating of the relationship based on patients' response data using Bayesian calculation. The original CRM has been criticized because it often tends to allocate too toxic doses to many patients and our proposal for overcoming this practical problem is to monitor a posterior density function of the occurrence of the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at each dose level. A simulation study shows that strategies based on our proposal allocate a smaller number of patients to doses higher than the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) compared with the original method while the mean squared error of the probability of the DLT occurrence at the MTD is not inflated. We present a couple of extensions of the CRM with real prospective applications: (i) monitoring efficacy and toxicity simultaneously in a combination phase I/II trial; (ii) combining the idea of pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation (PKGDE) and utilization of animal toxicity data in determining the prior distribution. A stopping rule based on the idea of separation among the DLT density functions is discussed in the first example and a strategy for determining the model parameter of the dose-toxicity relationship is suggested in the second example. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523075     DOI: 10.1002/sim.735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

Review 1.  Statistics in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephanie J Green; Donna K Pauler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.901

3.  Robust EM Continual Reassessment Method in Oncology Dose Finding.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Approaches to phase 1 clinical trial design focused on safety, efficiency, and selected patient populations: a report from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee.

Authors:  S Percy Ivy; Lillian L Siu; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Larry Rubinstein
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Bayesian Dose Finding for Combined Drugs with Discrete and Continuous Doses.

Authors:  Lin Huo; Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.728

Review 7.  A systematic review of limited sampling strategies for platinum agents used in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gabriel W Loh; Lillian S L Ting; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Ye Cui; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Zhibo Wang; Zheng Li; Ruiyan Luo; Michael Kutner; Fadlo R Khuri; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 9.  Systems pharmacology, pharmacogenetics, and clinical trial design in network medicine.

Authors:  Elliott Antman; Scott Weiss; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2012-05-11

10.  Motivating sample sizes in adaptive Phase I trials via Bayesian posterior credible intervals.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.