Literature DB >> 11522942

Processing specificity for human voice stimuli: electrophysiological evidence.

D A Levy1, R Granot, S Bentin.   

Abstract

Recent neuroimaging studies have provided evidence for localized perceptual specificity in the processing of human voice stimuli, paralleling the specificity for human faces. This study attempted to delineate the perceptual features of human voices yielding selective processing, and to characterize its time-course. Electrophysiological recordings revealed a positive potential peaking at 320 ms post-stimulus onset, in response to sung tones compared with fundamental-frequency-matched instrumental tones, when both categories were distracters in an oddball task. This voice-specific response (VSR) evoked under conditions different from those yielding positivity at that latency in other contexts, indicates the overriding salience of voice stimuli, possibly reflecting the operation of a gating system directing voice stimuli to be processed differently from other acoustic stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11522942     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200108280-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  26 in total

1.  Dissociation of human and computer voices in the brain: evidence for a preattentive gestalt-like perception.

Authors:  Sonja Lattner; Burkhard Maess; Yunhua Wang; Michael Schauer; Kai Alter; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A temporal hierarchy for conspecific vocalization discrimination in humans.

Authors:  Marzia De Lucia; Stephanie Clarke; Micah M Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Voice processing in human and non-human primates.

Authors:  Pascal Belin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Training to use voice onset time as a cue to talker identification induces a left-ear/right-hemisphere processing advantage.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Courtney Driscoll
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Asymmetries of the human social brain in the visual, auditory and chemical modalities.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Giuliana Lucci; Andrea Mazzatenta; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Auditory object perception: A neurobiological model and prospective review.

Authors:  Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; James W Lewis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Early Cortical Sensitivity to Human Conspecific Mimic Voice as a Distinct Category of Natural Sound.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Jeremy Donai; Alexandra S Kadner; Molly L Layne; Andrew Forino; Sijin Wen; Si Gao; Margeaux M Gray; Alexandria J Ashraf; Gabriela N Valencia; Brandon D Smith; Stephanie K Khoo; Stephen J Gray; Norman Lass; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Susannah Engdahl; David Graham; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Words and melody are intertwined in perception of sung words: EEG and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Reyna L Gordon; Daniele Schön; Cyrille Magne; Corine Astésano; Mireille Besson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Top-down and bottom-up modulation in processing bimodal face/voice stimuli.

Authors:  Marianne Latinus; Rufin VanRullen; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices.

Authors:  Ian Charest; Cyril R Pernet; Guillaume A Rousselet; Ileana Quiñones; Marianne Latinus; Sarah Fillion-Bilodeau; Jean-Pierre Chartrand; Pascal Belin
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.