Literature DB >> 11521603

How can action research apply to health services?

B Morrison1, R Lilford.   

Abstract

The authors ask whether and how action research can apply to health services research, given action research's claim to be radically different from mainstream research. They analyze the key tenets of an idealized version of action research, comparing them with those of the approach characteristic of mainstream research. The authors conclude, firstly, that action research deserves all credit for pioneering flexible and imaginative ways of working. Yet, there is nothing in the fundamental logic of the mainstream approach to preclude it from adopting some of these. Action researchers therefore need to reconsider their critical stance toward mainstream research. Conversely, mainstream researchers need to reconsider their critical stance toward the ways of working pioneered by action research and to adopt them as appropriate.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11521603     DOI: 10.1177/104973201129119235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  13 in total

1.  Closing the loop: action research in a multimodal hereditary cancer patient conference is an effective tool to assess and address patient needs.

Authors:  Carin R Espenschied; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Sharon Sand; Karen Hurley; Kimberly C Banks; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Managing resources in NHS dentistry: using health economics to inform commissioning decisions.

Authors:  Richard D Holmes; Jimmy Steele; Catherine E Exley; Cam Donaldson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Closing the loop: an interactive action-research conference format for delivering updated medical information while eliciting Latina patient/family experiences and psychosocial needs post-genetic cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Deborah J Macdonald; Julia Deri; Charité Ricker; Martin A Perez; Raquel Ogaz; Nancy Feldman; Lori A Viveros; Benjamin Paz; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  The FEeding Support Team (FEST) randomised, controlled feasibility trial of proactive and reactive telephone support for breastfeeding women living in disadvantaged areas.

Authors:  Pat Hoddinott; Leone Craig; Graeme Maclennan; Dwayne Boyers; Luke Vale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Barriers to participation in mental health research: are there specific gender, ethnicity and age related barriers?

Authors:  Anna Woodall; Craig Morgan; Claire Sloan; Louise Howard
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Improving management of student clinical placements: insights from activity theory.

Authors:  Maree O'Keefe; Victoria Wade; Sue McAllister; Ieva Stupans; Teresa Burgess
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Application of action research in the field of healthcare: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Mary Casey; David Coghlan; Áine Carroll; Diarmuid Stokes; Kinley Roberts; Geralyn Hynes
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2021-06-15

8.  Involving deprived communities in improving the quality of primary care services: does participatory action research work?

Authors:  Peter G Cawston; Stewart W Mercer; Rosaline S Barbour
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  A new era for intervention development studies.

Authors:  Pat Hoddinott
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2015-10-26

10.  How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research.

Authors:  Pat Hoddinott; Alex Pollock; Alicia O'Cathain; Isabel Boyer; Jane Taylor; Chris MacDonald; Sandy Oliver; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.