Literature DB >> 22678665

Closing the loop: an interactive action-research conference format for delivering updated medical information while eliciting Latina patient/family experiences and psychosocial needs post-genetic cancer risk assessment.

Deborah J Macdonald1, Julia Deri, Charité Ricker, Martin A Perez, Raquel Ogaz, Nancy Feldman, Lori A Viveros, Benjamin Paz, Jeffrey N Weitzel, Kathleen R Blazer.   

Abstract

A patient/family-centered conference was conducted at an underserved community hospital to address Latinas' post-genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) medical information and psychosocial support needs, and determine the utility of the action research format. Latinas seen for GCRA were recruited to a half-day conference conducted in Spanish. Content was partly determined from follow-up survey feedback. Written surveys, interactive discussions, and Audience Response System (ARS) queries facilitated the participant-healthcare professional action research process. Analyses included descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. The 71 attendees (41 patients and 27 relatives/friends) were primarily non-US born Spanish-speaking females, mean age 43 years. Among patients, 73 % had a breast cancer history; 85 % had BRCA testing (49 % BRCA+). Nearly all (96 %) attendees completed the conference surveys and ARS queries; ≥48 % participated in interactive discussions. Most (95 %) agreed that the format met their personal interests and expectations and provided useful information and resources. Gaps/challenges identified in the GCRA process included pre-consult anxiety, uncertainty about reason for referral and expected outcomes, and psychosocial needs post-GCRA, such as absorbing and disseminating risk information to relatives and concurrently coping with a recent cancer diagnosis. The combined action research and educational conference format was innovative and effective for responding to continued patient information needs and addressing an important data gap about support needs of Latina patients and family members following genetic cancer risk assessment. Findings informed GCRA process improvements and provide a basis for theory-driven cancer control research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678665      PMCID: PMC3620038          DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9535-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  28 in total

1.  Using the common sense model to understand perceived cancer risk in individuals testing for BRCA1/2 mutations.

Authors:  Kimberly Kelly; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski; Deborah Toppmeyer; Judy Much; James Dermody; Monica Marvin; Jill Baran; Marvin Schwalb
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Jennifer E Axilbund; Eileen Bryant; Saundra Buys; Charis Eng; Susan Friedman; Laura J Esserman; Carolyn D Farrell; James M Ford; Judy E Garber; Joanne M Jeter; Wendy Kohlmann; Patrick M Lynch; P Kelly Marcom; Lisle M Nabell; Kenneth Offit; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Boris Pasche; Gwen Reiser; Rebecca Sutphen; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Beliefs and interest in cancer risk in an underserved Latino cohort.

Authors:  Charité N Ricker; Sue Hiyama; Susan Fuentes; Nancy Feldman; Vasanth Kumar; Gwen C Uman; Raluca Nedelcu; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Common-sense beliefs about cancer and health practices among women completing treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Erin S Costanzo; Susan K Lutgendorf; Susan L Roeder
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Peer-support in coping with medical uncertainty: discussion of oophorectomy and hormone replacement therapy on a web-based message board.

Authors:  Regina H Kenen; Pamela J Shapiro; Susan Friedman; James C Coyne
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  "The bigger the network the bigger the bowl of cherries...": exploring the acceptability of, and preferences for, an ongoing support network for known BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lisa Hughes; Ceri Phelps
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC).

Authors:  Regina Kenen; Audrey Arden-Jones; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  An investigation of the disclosure process and support needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.

Authors:  Jordana Segal; Mary Jane Esplen; Brenda Toner; Sylvia Baedorf; Steven Narod; Kate Butler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.802

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in BRCA Counseling and Testing: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Christina D Williams; Alyssa Jasmine Bullard; Meghan O'Leary; Reana Thomas; Thomas S Redding; Karen Goldstein
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-04-08

2.  BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk Latinas in New York City: new beliefs shape new generation.

Authors:  Katarina M Sussner; Tiffany Edwards; Cristina Villagra; M Carina Rodriguez; Hayley S Thompson; Lina Jandorf; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Ethics and Community Involvement in Syntheses Concerning American Indian, Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew O Gribble; Deana M Around Him
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  Creation and Implementation of an Environmental Scan to Assess Cancer Genetics Services at Three Oncology Care Settings.

Authors:  Erica M Bednar; Michael T Walsh; Ellen Baker; Kimberly I Muse; Holly D Oakley; Rebekah C Krukenberg; Cara S Dresbold; Sandra B Jenkinson; Amanda L Eppolito; Kelly B Teed; Molly H Klein; Nichole A Morman; Elizabeth C Bowdish; Pauline Russ; Emaline E Wise; Julia N Cooper; Michael W Method; John W Henson; Andrew V Grainger; Banu K Arun; Karen H Lu
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Experience Gained from the Development and Execution of a Multidisciplinary Multi-syndrome Hereditary Colon Cancer Family Conference.

Authors:  Ilana Solomon; Christina Rybak; Lily Van Tongeren; Lili Kuzmich; Kathleen Blazer; Bita Nehoray; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Shawnie Bray; Travis H Bray; Karen Hurley; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Thomas P Slavin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Developing a Decision-Aid Website for Breast Cancer Surgery: An Action Research Approach.

Authors:  Ling-Ming Tseng; Shuh-Jen Sheu; Yu-Ting Hung; Ching-Fang Wu; Te-Hsin Liang; Shin-Shang Chou; Guan-Liang Chen; Pei-Ni Wu; Guan-Rong Su; Tsuey-Huah Jang; Chang-Yi Liu; Ching-Yen Wang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  State of recent literature on communication about cancer genetic testing among Latinx populations.

Authors:  Daniel Chavez-Yenter; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.