Literature DB >> 11510625

Pharmacological treatment of traumatic brain injury: a review of agents in development.

J Hatton1.   

Abstract

Successful treatment strategies for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain elusive despite standardised clinical treatment guidelines, improved understanding of mechanisms of cellular response to trauma, and a decade of clinical trials aimed at identifying therapeutic agents targeted at mediators of secondary injury. The information explosion relative to mechanisms of secondary injury has identified several potential targets for intervention. Depending on the type of injury to the brain and the intensity and the success of resuscitation, necrosis, apoptosis, inflammatory and excitotoxic cellular damage can be seen. These same processes may continue postinjury, depending on the adequacy of clinical care. Each of these mechanisms of cellular damage can initiate a cascade of events mediated by endogenous signals that lead to secondary neurological injury. Several factors contributed to the failure of earlier clinical trials. Now that these have been recognised, a positive impact on future drug development in TBI has been realised. Both the US and Europe have organised brain injury consortiums where experts in the treatment of TBI provide insight into study design, implementation, conduct and oversight in conjunction with the pharmaceutical industry. Consequently, future clinical trials of new investigational treatments have greater potential for identifying therapies of merit in specific populations of patients with TBI. Pharmacological strategies under investigation are targeting sites involved in the secondary cascade that contribute to overall poor outcome following the primary injury. These treatments include ion channel antagonists including calcium channel antagonists, growth factors, antioxidants, stem cells, apoptosis inhibitors, and inhibitors of other signal modulators. In conclusion, the complexity of TBI pathology and the mechanisms contributing to secondary injury present unique therapeutic challenges. Appropriate research targets for intervention continue to be investigated, however, the likelihood of improving outcomes with a single approach is extremely small. There is a need for collaborative efforts to investigate the optimal time for drug administration and the logical sequence or combination of treatments that will ultimately lead to improved neurological outcomes in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11510625     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200115070-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  148 in total

1.  Glutamate receptor requirement for neuronal death from anoxia-reoxygenation: an in Vitro model for assessment of the neuroprotective effects of estrogens.

Authors:  L L Zaulyanov; P S Green; J W Simpkins
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.046

2.  Early neuronal expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha after experimental brain injury contributes to neurological impairment.

Authors:  S M Knoblach; L Fan; A I Faden
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 3.478

3.  Zinc supplementation is associated with improved neurologic recovery rate and visceral protein levels of patients with severe closed head injury.

Authors:  B Young; L Ott; E Kasarskis; R Rapp; K Moles; R J Dempsey; P A Tibbs; R Kryscio; C McClain
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Glutamate and the pathophysiology of hypoxic--ischemic brain damage.

Authors:  S M Rothman; J W Olney
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Cerebral hemodynamic effects of phenylephrine and L-arginine after cortical impact injury.

Authors:  L Cherian; G Chacko; J C Goodman; C S Robertson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Cerestat and other NMDA antagonists in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  K R Lees
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Molecular biology of CNS injury.

Authors:  A G Yakovlev; A I Faden
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations

Authors: 
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Intravenous insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in moderate-to-severe head injury: a phase II safety and efficacy trial.

Authors:  J Hatton; R P Rapp; K A Kudsk; R O Brown; M S Luer; J G Bukar; S A Chen; C J McClain; N Gesundheit; R J Dempsey; B Young
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 10.  Investigational neuroprotective drugs in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  M J Cawley; R K Marburger; G L Earl
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.230

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  A review of neuroprotection pharmacology and therapies in patients with acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin W McConeghy; Jimmi Hatton; Lindsey Hughes; Aaron M Cook
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve enhances cognitive and motor recovery following moderate fluid percussion injury in the rat.

Authors:  Douglas C Smith; Arlene A Modglin; Rodney W Roosevelt; Steven L Neese; Robert A Jensen; Ronald A Browning; Richard W Clough
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Dual Therapeutic Effects of C-10068, a Dextromethorphan Derivative, Against Post-Traumatic Nonconvulsive Seizures and Neuroinflammation in a Rat Model of Penetrating Ballistic-Like Brain Injury.

Authors:  Xi-Chun May Lu; Deborah A Shear; Philip B Graham; Gary W Bridson; Vinita Uttamsingh; Zhiyong Chen; Lai Yee Leung; Frank C Tortella
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Neuroimaging in traumatic brain imaging.

Authors:  Bruce Lee; Andrew Newberg
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-04

Review 5.  Targeting mitochondrial dysfunction in CNS injury using Methylene Blue; still a magic bullet?

Authors:  Hemendra J Vekaria; Lora Talley Watts; Ai-Ling Lin; Patrick G Sullivan
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Dosing and safety of cyclosporine in patients with severe brain injury.

Authors:  Jimmi Hatton; Bonnie Rosbolt; Philip Empey; Richard Kryscio; Byron Young
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Exacerbation of apoptosis of cortical neurons following traumatic brain injury in par-4 transgenic mice.

Authors:  Daniel J Payette; Jun Xie; Najeeb Shirwany; Qing Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-01-01

8.  Genetic disruption of cyclooxygenase-2 does not improve histological or behavioral outcome after traumatic brain injury in mice.

Authors:  Muzamil Ahmad; Marie E Rose; Vincent Vagni; Raymond P Griffith; C Edward Dixon; Patrick M Kochanek; Robert W Hickey; Steven H Graham
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Survival Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Drosophila Is Increased by Heterozygosity for a Mutation of the NF-κB Innate Immune Response Transcription Factor Relish.

Authors:  Laura C Swanson; Edna A Trujillo; Gene H Thiede; Rebeccah J Katzenberger; Evgenia Shishkova; Joshua J Coon; Barry Ganetzky; David A Wassarman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Effect of pregabalin in preventing secondary damage in traumatic brain injury: an experimental study.

Authors:  Cagatay Calikoglu; Hikmet Aytekin; Osman Akgül; Mehmet Hüseyin Akgül; Ahmet Ferruh Gezen; Feyzullah Akyuz; Murteza Cakir
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.