Literature DB >> 16379585

Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve enhances cognitive and motor recovery following moderate fluid percussion injury in the rat.

Douglas C Smith1, Arlene A Modglin, Rodney W Roosevelt, Steven L Neese, Robert A Jensen, Ronald A Browning, Richard W Clough.   

Abstract

Intermittent, chronically delivered electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) is an FDA-approved procedure for the treatment of refractory complex/partial epilepsy in humans. Stimulation of the vagus has also been shown to enhance memory storage processes in laboratory rats and human subjects. Recent evidence suggests that some of these effects of VNS may be due to the activation of neurons in the nucleus locus coeruleus resulting in the release of norepinephrine (NE) throughout the neuraxis. Because antagonism of NE systems has been shown to delay recovery of function following brain damage, it is possible that enhanced release of NE in the CNS may facilitate recovery of function. To evaluate this hypothesis the lateral fluid percussion injury (LFP) model of traumatic brain injury was used and a variety of motor and cognitive behavioral tests were employed to assess recovery in pre-trained stimulated, control, and sham-injured laboratory rats. Two hours following moderate LFP, vagus nerve stimulation (30.0-sec trains of 0.5 mA, 20.0 Hz, biphasic pulses) was initiated. Stimulation continued in each animal's home cage at 30-min intervals for a period of 14 days, with the exception of brief periods when the animals were disconnected for behavioral assessments. Motor behaviors were evaluated every other day following LFP and tests included beam walk, locomotor placing, and skilled forelimb reaching. In each measure an enhanced rate of recovery and /or level of final performance was observed in the VNS-LFP animals compared to nonstimulated LFP controls. Behavior in the Morris water maze was assessed on days 11-14 following injury. Stimulated LFP animals showed significantly shorter latencies to find the hidden platform than did controls. Despite these behavioral effects, neurohistological examination did not reveal significant differences in lesion extent, density of fluorojade positive neurons, reactive astrocytes or numbers of spared neurons in the CA3 subarea of the hippocampus, at least at the one time point studied 15 days post-injury. These results support the idea that vagus nerve stimulation enhances the neural plasticity that underlies recovery of function following brain damage and provides indirect support for the hypothesis that enhanced NE release may mediate the effect. Importantly, since VNS facilitated both the rate of recovery and the extent of motor and cognitive recovery, these findings suggest that electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve may prove to be an effective non-pharmacological treatment for traumatic brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16379585      PMCID: PMC1769332          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  64 in total

1.  Modulation of receptive field properties of thalamic somatosensory neurons by the depth of anesthesia.

Authors:  M H Friedberg; S M Lee; F F Ebner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A study of inputs to antidromically identified neurons of the locus coeruleus.

Authors:  M Takigawa; G J Mogenson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-10-28       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  K B Clark; D K Naritoku; D C Smith; R A Browning; R A Jensen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Progression from frontal-parietal to mesial-temporal epilepsy after fluid percussion injury in the rat.

Authors:  Raimondo D'Ambrosio; Jason S Fender; Jared P Fairbanks; Ednea A Simon; Donald E Born; Dana L Doyle; John W Miller
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Depletion of brain catecholamines: failure of ocular dominance shift after monocular occlusion in kittens.

Authors:  T Kasamatsu; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-10-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Intraventricular norepinephrine facilitates motor recovery following sensorimotor cortex injury.

Authors:  M G Boyeson; D M Feeney
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Posttraining electrical stimulation of vagal afferents with concomitant vagal efferent inactivation enhances memory storage processes in the rat.

Authors:  K B Clark; D C Smith; D L Hassert; R A Browning; D K Naritoku; R A Jensen
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Traumatic brain injury in the rat: characterization of a lateral fluid-percussion model.

Authors:  T K McIntosh; R Vink; L Noble; I Yamakami; S Fernyak; H Soares; A L Faden
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Widespread and lateralization effects of acute traumatic brain injury on norepinephrine turnover in the rat brain.

Authors:  B E Levin; K L Brown; G Pawar; A Dunn-Meynell
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1995-03-20       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Further evidence.

Authors:  D Walker-Batson; P Smith; S Curtis; H Unwin; R Greenlee
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  46 in total

1.  Transcutaneous Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Ameliorates Acute Ischemic Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Ilknur Ay; Rena Nasser; Bruce Simon; Hakan Ay
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  A behavioral and histological comparison of fluid percussion injury and controlled cortical impact injury to the rat sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Todd C Peterson; William R Maass; Jordan R Anderson; Gail D Anderson; Michael R Hoane
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Increased extracellular concentrations of norepinephrine in cortex and hippocampus following vagus nerve stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  Rodney W Roosevelt; Douglas C Smith; Richard W Clough; Robert A Jensen; Ronald A Browning
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Vagus nerve stimulation potentiates hippocampal LTP in freely-moving rats.

Authors:  Yantao Zuo; Douglas C Smith; Robert A Jensen
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-01-03

5.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Delivered with Motor Training Enhances Recovery of Function after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  David T Pruitt; Ariel N Schmid; Lily J Kim; Caroline M Abe; Jenny L Trieu; Connie Choua; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Effect of vagus nerve stimulation during transient focal cerebral ischemia on chronic outcome in rats.

Authors:  Teruyuki Hiraki; Wesley Baker; Joel H Greenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 7.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Chronic Histopathological and Behavioral Outcomes of Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury in Adult Male Animals.

Authors:  Nicole D Osier; Shaun W Carlson; Anthony DeSana; C Edward Dixon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  The effects of hypertonic saline and nicotinamide on sensorimotor and cognitive function following cortical contusion injury in the rat.

Authors:  Andrea Quigley; Arlene A Tan; Michael R Hoane
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Strain differences in response to traumatic brain injury in Long-Evans compared to Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Arlene A Tan; Andrea Quigley; Douglas C Smith; Michael R Hoane
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.