Literature DB >> 3800180

Sensitivity of routine clinical criteria for diagnosing myocardial infarction within 24 hours of hospitalization.

T H Lee, G W Rouan, M C Weisberg, D A Brand, E F Cook, D Acampora, L Goldman.   

Abstract

Myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 431 (30%) of 1460 patients with acute chest pain who had serial enzyme testing after admission to intensive or intermediate care units at three teaching and three community hospitals. The diagnosis was made within 12 hours of admission in 331 (77%) patients and within 24 hours in 415 (96%). Of the 16 patients with myocardial infarction who did not have enzyme abnormalities within 24 hours, 9 (56%) had recurrent ischemic pain during this 24-hour period. Of 451 patients who had neither enzyme abnormalities nor recurrent ischemic pain in the first 24 hours, only 7 (2%) ultimately met diagnostic criteria for myocardial infarction. These findings were prospectively validated in an independent testing set of 275 patients with myocardial infarction, 271 (99%) of whom either met diagnostic criteria for myocardial infarction or had recurrent ischemic pain within 24 hours of admission. These data suggest that 24 hours is nearly always a sufficient period to exclude myocardial infarction in patients without recurrent chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3800180     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-2-181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  32 in total

1.  Impact of the availability of a prior electrocardiogram on the triage of the patient with acute chest pain.

Authors:  T H Lee; E F Cook; M C Weisberg; G W Rouan; D A Brand; L Goldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  The electrocardiogram in ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: correlation with coronary anatomy and prognosis.

Authors:  Y Birnbaum; B J Drew
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A D Timmis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-27

4.  Evaluating decision aids: the next painful step.

Authors:  T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Emergency management of cardiac chest pain: a review.

Authors:  K R Herren; K Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Patients with acute chest pain who leave emergency departments against medical advice: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and natural history.

Authors:  T H Lee; L W Short; D A Brand; Y D Jean-Claude; M C Weisberg; G W Rouan; L Goldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Management strategies for a better outcome in unstable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R W Campbell; L Wallentin; F W Verheugt; A G Turpie; A Maseri; W Klein; J G Cleland; C Bode; R Becker; J Anderson; M E Bertrand; C R Conti
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Correlates of major complications and mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and more than bibasilar rales.

Authors:  M H Chin; E F Cook; T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Determinants of resource utilization for patients admitted for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  I S Udvarhelyi; L Goldman; A L Komaroff; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  [Dual-source CT in chest pain diagnosis].

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; K Nikolaou; C Fink; A Becker; A Knez; C Rist; M F Reiser; C R Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.