Literature DB >> 11493322

Giving tape recordings or written summaries of consultations to people with cancer: a systematic review.

J T Scott1, V A Entwistle, A J Sowden, I Watt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of providing recordings or summaries of consultations to people with cancer and their families.
DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cancerlit, EMBASE and other electronic bibliographic databases. Bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of the provision of taped recordings or written summaries of consultations to people with cancer and/or their families. MAIN
RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials were found, all involving adult participants. No non-randomized controlled trials were found. The quality of the studies was generally poor. Between 83% and 96% of people who received recordings or summaries found them useful to remind them of what was said and/or to inform family members and friends about their illness and treatment. Of seven studies that assessed recall of information given during the consultation, four reported better recall among the groups that received recordings or summaries than among control groups. Receiving a recording or summary had no significant effect on anxiety or depression between the groups. None of the included studies assessed survival or health outcomes other than psychological outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Wider use of consultation tapes and summary letters could benefit many adults with cancer, without causing additional anxiety or depression, but consideration should be given to individuals' circumstances and preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11493322      PMCID: PMC5060066          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00127.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  35 in total

1.  No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Lesley Fallowfield; Sarah Ford; Shon Lewis
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study.

Authors:  G M Leydon; M Boulton; C Moynihan; A Jones; J Mossman; M Boudioni; K McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

3.  Letters to patients: improving communication in cancer care.

Authors:  D Damian; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Cancer and communication: information-giving in an oncology clinic.

Authors:  P M Reynolds; R W Sanson-Fisher; A D Poole; J Harker; M J Byrne
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-05-02

5.  Communications in an out-patient setting.

Authors:  P Ley; M S Spelman
Journal:  Br J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  1965-06

6.  Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views.

Authors:  C Meredith; P Symonds; L Webster; D Lamont; E Pyper; C R Gillis; L Fallowfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

7.  Communication with parents of children with cancer.

Authors:  O B Eden; I Black; G A MacKinlay; A E Emery
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  General information tapes inhibit recall of the cancer consultation.

Authors:  S M Dunn; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; Q J Jones; J S Sheldon; J J Taylor; M D Sumich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A method for better physician-patient communication.

Authors:  H R Butt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  6 in total

1.  Natural language processing for automated annotation of medication mentions in primary care visit conversations.

Authors:  Craig H Ganoe; Weiyi Wu; Paul J Barr; William Haslett; Michelle D Dannenberg; Kyra L Bonasia; James C Finora; Jesse A Schoonmaker; Wambui M Onsando; James Ryan; Glyn Elwyn; Martha L Bruce; Amar K Das; Saeed Hassanpour
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-08-19

2.  Patient-Reported Use of Personalized Video Recordings to Improve Neurosurgical Patient-Provider Communication.

Authors:  Andrew J Meeusen; Randall Porter
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-06-02

3.  Measuring recall of medical information in non-English-speaking people with cancer: A methodology.

Authors:  Ruby Lipson-Smith; Amelia Hyatt; Alexandra Murray; Phyllis Butow; Thomas F Hack; Michael Jefford; Uldis Ozolins; Sandra Hale; Penelope Schofield
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Patient Information Needs and Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Tracey L Carr; Gary Groot; David Cochran; Lorraine Holtslander
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  An Audio Personal Health Library of Clinic Visit Recordings for Patients and Their Caregivers (HealthPAL): User-Centered Design Approach.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; William Haslett; Michelle D Dannenberg; Lisa Oh; Glyn Elwyn; Saeed Hassanpour; Kyra L Bonasia; James C Finora; Jesse A Schoonmaker; W Moraa Onsando; James Ryan; Martha L Bruce; Amar K Das; Roger Arend; Sheryl Piper; Craig H Ganoe
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Audio-/Videorecording Clinic Visits for Patient's Personal Use in the United States: Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Kyra Bonasia; Kanak Verma; Michelle D Dannenberg; Cameron Yi; Ethan Andrews; Marisha Palm; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Meredith Masel; Marie-Anne Durand
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.