Literature DB >> 1681275

Letters to patients: improving communication in cancer care.

D Damian1, M H Tattersall.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that patients are usually dissatisfied with the information they receive during clinical consultations with medical specialists. Therefore, a randomised study design has been used to assess the role of personal letters to patients outlining their cancer consultation. Compared with the control group, patients receiving letters were more satisfied with the amount of information given, and tended to have greater and more accurate recall of the consultation. A survey of referring doctors revealed general support for the idea of sending to cancer patients letters that outline the substance of their consultations. The study shows that letters to patients are a useful method of improving patient satisfaction and recall in clinical consultations. They also provide a permanent record of the consultation, which can be kept for future reference, and encourage greater patient involvement in their care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1681275     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91782-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  18 in total

1.  Challenges optimizing the after visit summary.

Authors:  Alex Federman; Erin Sarzynski; Cindy Brach; Paul Francaviglia; Jessica Jacques; Lina Jandorf; Angela Sanchez Munoz; Michael Wolf; Joseph Kannry
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 2.  A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations.

Authors:  Philip W B Watson; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Utility of a Referral Letter to Improve Comprehensibility of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: a Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Eva-Marie Kloeppel; Hani Hanaya; Eckart Seilacher; Sarah Schroth; Patrick Liebl; Christian Keinki; Marie Jolin Koester; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  A study of how urology out-patients like to receive clinical information.

Authors:  D N Wood; A Deshpande; M Wijewardena; S S Gujral
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Evaluation and audit in a paediatric disability service.

Authors:  H D Cass; B T Kugler
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Teaching communication skills. Putting it on paper helps patient understanding.

Authors:  J S Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-10

Review 7.  Giving tape recordings or written summaries of consultations to people with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J T Scott; V A Entwistle; A J Sowden; I Watt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Meeting patients' information needs beyond the year 2000.

Authors:  M H Tattersall; P N Butow; P M Ellis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Integrating automated patient letter generation into the electronic medical record.

Authors:  Asli Ozdas; Jim N Jirjis; Dario Giuse; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

10.  Using health communication best practices to develop a web-based provider-patient communication aid: the CONNECT study.

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Joanne Buzaglo; Michael Collins; Jennifer Millard; Suzanne M Miller; Brian L Egleston; Nicholas Solarino; Jonathan Trinastic; Donald J Cegala; Al B Benson; Kevin A Schulman; Kevin P Weinfurt; Daniel Sulmasy; Michael A Diefenbach; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.