H K Delichatsios1, M K Hunt, R Lobb, K Emmons, M W Gillman. 1. Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA 02215, USA. hdelichatsios@partners.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated a multifaceted preventive nutrition intervention to improve dietary habits among adult primary care patients. METHODS: We randomized six group practices in a managed care organization. Participants completed baseline and 3-month follow-up surveys. The intervention comprised (1) mailed personalized dietary recommendations and educational booklets focusing on fruits and vegetables, red meat, and dairy foods, tailored to patients' baseline intake and stage of readiness to change eating behaviors; (2) verbal endorsement by the primary care provider of the benefits of these recommendations; and (3) two motivational counseling sessions with telephone counselors to set dietary goals. RESULTS: Among the 230 subjects in the intervention group and 274 in the control group, mean age was 54 years, 70% were female, and 91% were white and 7% African American. Eighty-nine percent of the participants completed the follow-up survey. We measured change in intake of foods using results from the baseline and follow-up food frequency questionnaires. Using an intention-to-treat analysis and adjusting for age, sex, race, and baseline intake, the change in fruit and vegetable intake in the intervention group was 0.6 (95% confidence interval 0.3, 0.8) servings/day higher than in the control group. There was no intervention effect on red meat and dairy products. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored clinical nutrition interventions that combine brief physician endorsement with practice supports may be effective in changing patients' eating behavior. Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We evaluated a multifaceted preventive nutrition intervention to improve dietary habits among adult primary care patients. METHODS: We randomized six group practices in a managed care organization. Participants completed baseline and 3-month follow-up surveys. The intervention comprised (1) mailed personalized dietary recommendations and educational booklets focusing on fruits and vegetables, red meat, and dairy foods, tailored to patients' baseline intake and stage of readiness to change eating behaviors; (2) verbal endorsement by the primary care provider of the benefits of these recommendations; and (3) two motivational counseling sessions with telephone counselors to set dietary goals. RESULTS: Among the 230 subjects in the intervention group and 274 in the control group, mean age was 54 years, 70% were female, and 91% were white and 7% African American. Eighty-nine percent of the participants completed the follow-up survey. We measured change in intake of foods using results from the baseline and follow-up food frequency questionnaires. Using an intention-to-treat analysis and adjusting for age, sex, race, and baseline intake, the change in fruit and vegetable intake in the intervention group was 0.6 (95% confidence interval 0.3, 0.8) servings/day higher than in the control group. There was no intervention effect on red meat and dairy products. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored clinical nutrition interventions that combine brief physician endorsement with practice supports may be effective in changing patients' eating behavior. Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
Authors: Nancy T Artinian; Gerald F Fletcher; Dariush Mozaffarian; Penny Kris-Etherton; Linda Van Horn; Alice H Lichtenstein; Shiriki Kumanyika; William E Kraus; Jerome L Fleg; Nancy S Redeker; Janet C Meininger; Joanne Banks; Eileen M Stuart-Shor; Barbara J Fletcher; Todd D Miller; Suzanne Hughes; Lynne T Braun; Laurie A Kopin; Kathy Berra; Laura L Hayman; Linda J Ewing; Philip A Ades; J Larry Durstine; Nancy Houston-Miller; Lora E Burke Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David Edelman; Eugene Z Oddone; Richard S Liebowitz; William S Yancy; Maren K Olsen; Amy S Jeffreys; Samuel D Moon; Amy C Harris; Linda L Smith; Ruth E Quillian-Wolever; Tracy W Gaudet Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Karen M Emmons; Ann M Stoddard; Robert Fletcher; Caitlin Gutheil; Elizabeth Gonzalez Suarez; Rebecca Lobb; Jane Weeks; Judy Anne Bigby Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sarah Dennis; Anna Williams; Jane Taggart; Anthony Newall; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson; Nicholas Zwar; Tim Shortus; Mark F Harris Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Jane Taggart; Anna Williams; Sarah Dennis; Anthony Newall; Tim Shortus; Nicholas Zwar; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson; Mark F Harris Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Ingrid E Lobo; Danielle F Loeb; Vahram Ghushchyan; Irene E Schauer; Amy G Huebschmann Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 2.830