OBJECTIVE: To investigate what role family physicians currently play in the management of patients with nutrition-related issues and whether implementation of current nutrition counseling guidelines is feasible in primary care practices. DESIGN: Mailed survey. SETTING: Family practice offices in British Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 451 Canadian-trained family physicians practising in British Columbia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents' demographic characteristics; respondents' attitudes about and perceived barriers to nutrition counseling, as well as their current practices and training in this area. RESULTS: Among the 757 physicians surveyed, the response rate was 59.6%. Overall, respondents had positive attitudes about the role of nutrition in patient health, and most physicians (58.1%) believed that more than 60% of their patients would benefit from nutrition counseling. However, there was a considerable gap between the proportion of patients who respondents thought would benefit from nutrition counseling and the proportion of patients who received such counseling either in the family physicians' offices or through referral to dietitians. Rural physicians referred patients to dietitian services more frequently than urban physicians did (41.7% vs 21.7% made more than 20 referrals to dietitians each year). Nearly all physicians identified lack of time and compensation as the strongest barriers to providing nutrition guidance. Training was not considered to be as strong a barrier to counseling, even though 82.3% of family physicians reported their formal nutrition training in medical school to be inadequate, and only 30% of family physicians reported currently using any nutrition-related resources. CONCLUSION: For family physicians, successful implementation of the 2006 Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management and Prevention of Obesity requires access to adequate training, compensation, and evidence-based interventions related to nutrition. This study highlights current nutrition counseling practices in family medicine and identifies several obstacles to integrating the current guidelines in primary care settings.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate what role family physicians currently play in the management of patients with nutrition-related issues and whether implementation of current nutrition counseling guidelines is feasible in primary care practices. DESIGN: Mailed survey. SETTING: Family practice offices in British Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 451 Canadian-trained family physicians practising in British Columbia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents' demographic characteristics; respondents' attitudes about and perceived barriers to nutrition counseling, as well as their current practices and training in this area. RESULTS: Among the 757 physicians surveyed, the response rate was 59.6%. Overall, respondents had positive attitudes about the role of nutrition in patient health, and most physicians (58.1%) believed that more than 60% of their patients would benefit from nutrition counseling. However, there was a considerable gap between the proportion of patients who respondents thought would benefit from nutrition counseling and the proportion of patients who received such counseling either in the family physicians' offices or through referral to dietitians. Rural physicians referred patients to dietitian services more frequently than urban physicians did (41.7% vs 21.7% made more than 20 referrals to dietitians each year). Nearly all physicians identified lack of time and compensation as the strongest barriers to providing nutrition guidance. Training was not considered to be as strong a barrier to counseling, even though 82.3% of family physicians reported their formal nutrition training in medical school to be inadequate, and only 30% of family physicians reported currently using any nutrition-related resources. CONCLUSION: For family physicians, successful implementation of the 2006 Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management and Prevention of Obesity requires access to adequate training, compensation, and evidence-based interventions related to nutrition. This study highlights current nutrition counseling practices in family medicine and identifies several obstacles to integrating the current guidelines in primary care settings.
Authors: Jennifer Medves; Margo Paterson; Christine Y Chapman; John H Young; Elizabeth Tata; Denise Bowes; Neil Hobbs; Brian McAndrews; Anne O'Riordan Journal: Rural Remote Health Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Michael P Pignone; Alice Ammerman; Louise Fernandez; C Tracy Orleans; Nola Pender; Steven Woolf; Kathleen N Lohr; Sonya Sutton Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Pao-Hwa Lin; William S Yancy; Kathryn I Pollak; Rowena J Dolor; Jennifer Marcello; Gregory P Samsa; Bryan C Batch; Laura P Svetkey Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Alan Katz; Anita Lambert-Lanning; Anthony Miller; Barbara Kaminsky; Jennifer Enns Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Monica Aggarwal; Naykky Singh Ospina; Amir Kazory; Islande Joseph; Zareen Zaidi; Ali Ataya; Markus Agito; Michael Bubb; Paulette Hahn; Maryam Sattari Journal: Am J Lifestyle Med Date: 2019-11-05
Authors: Carolyn T Bramante; Grace Lee; Safira S Amsili; Jennifer A Linde; Sean M Phelan; Lawrence J Appel; Wendy L Bennett; Jeanne M Clark; Kimberly A Gudzune Journal: Clin Obes Date: 2020-05-07
Authors: Madison E Santella; Rebecca L Hagedorn; Rachel A Wattick; Makenzie L Barr; Tanya M Horacek; Melissa D Olfert Journal: Int J Food Sci Nutr Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.833
Authors: Allison V Schlosser; Samantha Smith; Kakul Joshi; Anna Thornton; Erika S Trapl; Shari Bolen Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 5.128