Literature DB >> 21082213

Visualizing space, time, and agents: production, performance, and preference.

Angela Kessell1, Barbara Tversky.   

Abstract

Visualizations of space, time, and agents (or objects) are ubiquitous in science, business, and everyday life, from weather maps to scheduling meetings. Effective communications, including visual ones, emerge from use in the field, but no conventional visualization form has yet emerged for this confluence of information. The real-world spiral of production, comprehension, and use that fine-tunes communications can be accelerated in the laboratory. Here, we do so in search of effective visualizations of space, time, and agents. Users' production, preference, and performance aligned to favor matrix representations with time as rows or columns and space and agents as entries. Overall, performance and preference were greater for matrices with discrete dots representing cell entries than for matrices with lines, but lines connecting cells may provide an advantage when evaluating temporal sequence. Both the diagram type and the technique have broader applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21082213     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-010-0379-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  6 in total

1.  Bars and lines: a study of graphic communication.

Authors:  J Zacks; B Tversky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations.

Authors:  L R Novick; S M Hurley; M Francis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

3.  Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.

Authors:  L Boroditsky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Understanding spatial diagram structure: an analysis of hierarchies, matrices, and networks.

Authors:  Laura R Novick
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 5.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory.

Authors:  R A Zwaan; G A Radvansky
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Indexing events in memory: evidence for index dominance.

Authors:  H A Taylor; B Tversky
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1997-07
  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  How to put things together.

Authors:  Marie-Paule Daniel; Barbara Tversky
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08-26

2.  User Interface Requirements for Web-Based Integrated Care Pathways: Evidence from the Evaluation of an Online Care Pathway Investigation Tool.

Authors:  Panos Balatsoukas; Richard Williams; Colin Davies; John Ainsworth; Iain Buchan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Flexibility in data interpretation: effects of representational format.

Authors:  David W Braithwaite; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-31

4.  Creating visual explanations improves learning.

Authors:  Eliza Bobek; Barbara Tversky
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.