Literature DB >> 11482718

Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.

C C Ferraz1, N V Gomes, B P Gomes, A A Zaia, F B Teixeira, F J Souza-Filho.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the weight of debris and irrigant volume extruded apically from extracted teeth in vitro after endodontic instrumentation using the balanced force technique, a hybrid hand instrumentation technique, and three engine-driven techniques utilizing nickel-titanium instruments (ProFile .04, Quantec 2000 and Pow-R).
METHODOLOGY: Five groups of 20 extracted human teeth with single canals were instrumented using one or other of five techniques: balanced force, hybrid, Quantec 2000, ProFile .04, or Pow-R. Debris extruded from the apical foramen during instrumentation were collected into preweighed 1.5 mL tubes. Following instrumentation, the volume of extruded irrigant fluid was determined by visual comparison to control centrifuge tubes filled with 0.25 mL increments of distilled water. The weight of dry extruded dentine debris was also established.
RESULTS: Overall, the engine-driven techniques extruded less debris than the manual ones. However, there was no statistical difference between the balanced force technique and the engine-driven methods. The volume of irrigant extruded through the apex was directly associated with the weight of extruded debris, except within the ProFile group. The hybrid technique was associated with the greatest extrusion of both debris and irrigant.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the engine-driven nickel-titanium systems were associated with less apical extrusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11482718     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00394.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  50 in total

1.  [Comparison of the shaping capability of reciprocating instruments in simulated canals in vitro].

Authors:  Shao Tongfei; Hou Xiaomei; Hou Benxiang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-12

2.  Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation.

Authors:  Jelena Vidas; Damir Snjaric; Alen Braut; Zoran Carija; Romana Persic Bukmir; Roeland J G De Moor; Ivana Brekalo Prso
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Apical extrusion of debris during the preparation of oval root canals: a comparative study between a full-sequence SAF system and a rotary file system supplemented by XP-endo finisher file.

Authors:  Anda Kfir; Rotem Moza-Levi; Moran Herteanu; Amir Weissman; Ronald Wigler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of sodium hypochlorite extrusion by five irrigation systems using an artificial root socket model and a quantitative chemical method.

Authors:  Adham A Azim; Hacer Aksel; M Margaret Jefferson; George T-J Huang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal.

Authors:  Mary Kinue Nakamune Uezu; Maria Leticia Borges Britto; Cleber K Nabeshima; Raul Capp Pallotta
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Patrícia Santos Oliveira; Meire Coelho Ferreira; Natália Gomes Nascimento Paula; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Renata Grazziotin-Soares; Gisele Rodrigues da Silva; Helena Cristina Santos da Mata; José Bauer; Ceci Nunes Carvalho
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Thangi Sowjanya; Krishna Prasad Parvathaneni; Tbvg Raju; N Mahendra Varma; Gowtham Dev Dondapati; Srivalli Podili
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-06-13

8.  Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Ali Shokraneh; Majid Ajami; Nastaran Farhadi; Mohsen Hosseini; Bita Rohani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems − An in vitro study.

Authors:  Koppolu Madhusudhana; Vinod Babu Mathew; Nelaturi Madhusudhan Reddy
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2010-10

10.  An in vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper universal and GT series X files.

Authors:  Ramiro Montenegro-Santillán; Teresa Alegre-Domingo; Vicente Faus-Matoses; Vicente Faus-Llácer
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.