Literature DB >> 11481568

Differences due to collimator blurring in cardiac images with use of circular and elliptic camera orbits.

A Abufadel1, R L Eisner, R W Schafer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In cardiac imaging systems, an elliptic acquisition orbit about the patient can be used to enhance resolution of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images by minimizing the distance between the object imaged and the rotating detector system. In this study artifacts from images acquired with the standard circular acquisition are compared with those acquired with various elliptic acquisitions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: With the use of elliptic camera orbits of different eccentricities, simulated projection data were generated from a slice through the left ventricle (LV). The projection data included a simulation of the degradation due to the depth-dependent response of the collimator. As is common in many clinical systems, SPECT images were reconstructed with the standard filtered backprojection algorithm without correction for the collimator response. When the ratio of the major-to-minor axis of the acquisition arc is changed from 1 (circular) to 1.5 (elliptic), reconstructed SPECT images show an additional loss of counts (about 10%) in the apical region of the LV. The severity of the apical defect is also dependent on the starting angle of the acquisition arc. When the starting angle is changed from 0 degrees (detector parallel to the major axis of the LV) to 60 degrees, the ratio between the minimum count in the apical region and the maximum count in the left ventricular myocardial wall decreases by as much as 20%.
CONCLUSIONS: SPECT image artifacts from elliptic acquisitions are significantly more severe than those from circular acquisitions. Because of the significant difference in images reconstructed from circular and elliptic acquisitions, standardized normal files acquired from circular acquisitions should not be used for comparisons with patient data acquired from elliptic acquisitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11481568     DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2001.114235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  B M Tsui; E C Frey; K J LaCroix; D S Lalush; W H McCartney; M A King; G T Gullberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Projection space image reconstruction using strip functions to calculate pixels more "natural" for modeling the geometric response of the SPECT collimator.

Authors:  Y L Hsieh; G L Zeng; G T Gullberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Attenuation artifacts in SPECT: effect of wrap-around lung in 180 degrees cardiac studies.

Authors:  E V Di Bella; R L Eisner; A B Barclay; R E Patterson; D J Nowak
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Fundamentals of 180 degree acquisition and reconstruction in SPECT imaging.

Authors:  R L Eisner; D J Nowak; R Pettigrew; W Fajman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Physical attributes of single-photon tomography.

Authors:  T F Budinger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Advances in SPECT camera software and hardware: currently available and new on the horizon.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  C-SPECT - a Clinical Cardiac SPECT/Tct Platform: Design Concepts and Performance Potential.

Authors:  Wei Chang; Caesar E Ordonez; Haoning Liang; Yusheng Li; Jingai Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 1.679

3.  Why does SPECT work?

Authors:  Stephen L Bacharach
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Validation of threshold method for myocardial control database by use of clinical data.

Authors:  Atsushi Narita; Susumu Shiomi; Joji Kawabe; Hiroyuki Tsushima; Takashi Yamanaga; Yasuyoshi Watanabe
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-06-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.