Literature DB >> 21173627

Nonfusion treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by growth modulation and remodeling.

David D Aronsson1, Ian A F Stokes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common disorder in which the spine gradually develops a curvature that is first detected in patients between 11 and 17 years of age. The only accepted treatment methods are bracing and surgery. Whether brace treatment alters the natural history is being questioned, and patient compliance is low. Surgery usually includes a spinal fusion that creates a rigid spine and concentrates stresses at the ends.
METHODS: This study focuses on correlating the laboratory results with clinical reports for treating patients with AIS. In the laboratory, scoliosis with vertebral wedging has been created by asymmetric mechanical loading and has been corrected by reversing the loading. In the clinic, bracing and derotational casting have been successful in some reports, but compliance has been a problem with bracing and derotational casts have mainly been used in young children. Operative treatment has been successful, but a nonfusion operation remains elusive. FINDINGS AND
RESULTS: In the laboratory, axial loading of growth plates altered growth according to the Hueter-Volkmann law, which states that compression decreases and distraction increases growth. Asymmetric loading of the spine caused asymmetric growth resulting in scoliosis with vertebral wedging. Asymmetric loading of tail vertebrae created vertebral wedging according to Wolff's law, which states that the bone remodels over time in response to prevailing mechanical demands. In the clinic, studies have shown that bracing may work if patients wore the brace as prescribed. Derotational casting in young children has been shown to prevent progression and even correct the scoliosis in some patients. Convex vertebral stapling has been successful in mild curves, but the results in larger curves have been disappointing. Anterolateral tethering has been successful in mild curves in young patients, but there is limited experience with this technique in patients with large curves.
CONCLUSIONS: A brace that applies the appropriate loading and is worn as prescribed may dramatically improve the results of brace treatment. A procedure using external fixation or adjustable anterolateral tethering may achieve a nonfusion correction of AIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21173627      PMCID: PMC3086537          DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318203b141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  38 in total

1.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment with the Wilmington brace. A comparison of full-time and part-time use.

Authors:  N J Allington; J R Bowen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Spinal growth modulation with use of a tether in an immature porcine model.

Authors:  Peter O Newton; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Christine L Farnsworth; Richard Oka; Reid C Chambers; Jerry Dwek; Jung Ryul Kim; Andrew Perry; Andrew T Mahar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  External fixation for dynamic correction of severe scoliosis.

Authors:  Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez; Luis Miguel Rosales; Víctor Miramontes
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  No effect of osteopathic treatment on trunk morphology and spine flexibility in young women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol Hasler; Caius Schmid; Andreas Enggist; Conny Neuhaus; Thomas Erb
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Endochondral growth in growth plates of three species at two anatomical locations modulated by mechanical compression and tension.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; David D Aronsson; Abigail N Dimock; Valerie Cortright; Samantha Beck
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Derotational casting for progressive infantile scoliosis.

Authors:  James O Sanders; Jacques D'Astous; Marcie Fitzgerald; Joseph G Khoury; Shyam Kishan; Peter F Sturm
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Convex anterior and posterior hemiarthrodesis and hemiepiphyseodesis in young children with progressive congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  R B Winter
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Man Sang Wong; Jack C Y Cheng; Tsz Ping Lam; Bobby K W Ng; Sai Wing Sin; Sandra L F Lee-Shum; Daniel H K Chow; Sandra Y P Tam
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Part-time bracing of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  N E Green
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis.

Authors:  George H Thompson; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Robert M Campbell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  7 in total

1.  Defining the learning curve in CT-guided navigated thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering.

Authors:  Smitha Mathew; A Noelle Larson; D Dean Potter; Todd A Milbrandt
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-05-18

2.  Vertebral Body Tethering in 49 Adolescent Patients after Peak Height Velocity for the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: 2-5 Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  James Meyers; Lily Eaker; Jessica Zhang; Theodor di Pauli von Treuheim; Baron Lonner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  SEAS (Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis): a modern and effective evidence based approach to physiotherapic specific scoliosis exercises.

Authors:  Michele Romano; Alessandra Negrini; Silvana Parzini; Marta Tavernaro; Fabio Zaina; Sabrina Donzelli; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-02-05

4.  A Novel Spinal Implant for Fusionless Scoliosis Correction: A Biomechanical Analysis of the Motion Preserving Properties of a Posterior Periapical Concave Distraction Device.

Authors:  Roderick M Holewijn; Marinus de Kleuver; Albert J van der Veen; Kaj S Emanuel; Arno Bisschop; Agnita Stadhouder; Barend J van Royen; Idsart Kingma
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07

5.  Reactivation of Vertebral Growth Plate Function in Vertebral Body Tethering in an Animal Model.

Authors:  Michał Latalski; Tomasz Szponder; Grzegorz Starobrat; Edward Warda; Magdalena Wójciak; Sławomir Dresler; Anna Danielewicz; Jan Sawicki; Ireneusz Sowa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Inter- and intra-rater reliability and accuracy of Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging System when used by surgeons performing vertebral body tethering.

Authors:  Lauren M Swany; A Noelle Larson; Todd A Milbrandt; James O Sanders; Kevin M Neal; Laurel C Blakemore; Peter O Newton; Joshua M Pahys; Patrick J Cahill; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-07-22

7.  The new Lyon ARTbrace versus the historical Lyon brace: a prospective case series of 148 consecutive scoliosis with short time results after 1 year compared with a historical retrospective case series of 100 consecutive scoliosis; SOSORT award 2015 winner.

Authors:  Jean Claude de Mauroy; Alexandre Journe; Fabio Gagaliano; Cyril Lecante; Frederic Barral; Sophie Pourret
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-08-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.