Literature DB >> 11477076

High thermostability and lack of cooperative DNA binding distinguish the p63 core domain from the homologous tumor suppressor p53.

C Klein1, G Georges, K P Künkele, R Huber, R A Engh, S Hansen.   

Abstract

The p53 protein is the major tumor suppressor in mammals. The discovery of the p53 homologs p63 and p73 defined a family of p53 members with distinct roles in tumor suppression, differentiation, and development. Here, we describe the biochemical characterization of the core DNA-binding domain of a human isoform of p63, p63-delta, and particularly novel features in comparison with p53. In contrast to p53, the free p63 core domain did not show specific binding to p53 DNA consensus sites. However, glutathione S-transferase-fused and thus dimerized p63 and p53 core domains had similar affinity and specificity for the p53 consensus sites p21, gadd45, cyclin G, and bax. Furthermore, the fold of p63 core was remarkably stable compared with p53 as judged by differential scanning calorimetry (T(m) = 61 degrees C versus 44 degrees C for p53) and equilibrium unfolding ([urea](50%) = 5.2 m versus 3.1 m for p53). A homology model of p63 core highlights differences at a segment near the H1 helix hypothetically involved in the formation of the dimerization interface in p53, which might reduce cooperativity of p63 core DNA binding compared with p53. The model also shows differences in the electrostatic and hydrophobic potentials of the domains relevant to folding stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11477076     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M103801200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  25 in total

1.  Pliable DNA conformation of response elements bound to transcription factor p63.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Natalia Gorlatova; Osnat Herzberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Differential recognition of response elements determines target gene specificity for p53 and p63.

Authors:  Motonobu Osada; Hannah Lui Park; Yuichi Nagakawa; Keishi Yamashita; Alexey Fomenkov; Myoung Sook Kim; Guojun Wu; Shuji Nomoto; Barry Trink; David Sidransky
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  A p53-type response element in the GDF15 promoter confers high specificity for p53 activation.

Authors:  Motonobu Osada; Hannah Lui Park; Min Joo Park; Jun-Wei Liu; Guojun Wu; Barry Trink; David Sidransky
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Effects of stability on the biological function of p53.

Authors:  Kian Hoe Khoo; Sebastian Mayer; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Structures of p63 DNA binding domain in complexes with half-site and with spacer-containing full response elements.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Natalia Gorlatova; Zvi Kelman; Osnat Herzberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dipeptide analysis of p53 mutations and evolution of p53 family proteins.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Long Yu; Arnold J Levine; Ruth Nussinov; Buyong Ma
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-04-10

7.  Intrinsic aggregation propensity of the p63 and p73 TI domains correlates with p53R175H interaction and suggests further significance of aggregation events in the p53 family.

Authors:  Sebastian Kehrloesser; Christian Osterburg; Marcel Tuppi; Birgit Schäfer; Karen Heather Vousden; Volker Dötsch
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  Crystal structure of a p53 core tetramer bound to DNA.

Authors:  K A Malecka; W C Ho; R Marmorstein
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Cooperativity dominates the genomic organization of p53-response elements: a mechanistic view.

Authors:  Yongping Pan; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The p53 core domain is a molten globule at low pH: functional implications of a partially unfolded structure.

Authors:  Ana Paula D Ano Bom; Monica S Freitas; Flavia S Moreira; Danielly Ferraz; Daniel Sanches; Andre M O Gomes; Ana Paula Valente; Yraima Cordeiro; Jerson L Silva
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.