Literature DB >> 22247550

Pliable DNA conformation of response elements bound to transcription factor p63.

Chen Chen1, Natalia Gorlatova, Osnat Herzberg.   

Abstract

We show that changes in the nucleotide sequence alter the DNA conformation in the crystal structures of p63 DNA-binding domain (p63DBD) bound to its response element. The conformation of a 22-bp canonical response element containing an AT spacer between the two half-sites is unaltered compared with that containing a TA spacer, exhibiting superhelical trajectory. In contrast, a GC spacers abolishes the DNA superhelical trajectory and exhibits less bent DNA, suggesting that increased GC content accompanies increased double helix rigidity. A 19-bp DNA, representing an AT-rich response element with overlapping half-sites, maintains superhelical trajectory and reveals two interacting p63DBD dimers crossing one another at 120°. p63DBD binding assays to response elements of increasing length complement the structural studies. We propose that DNA deformation may affect promoter activity, that the ability of p63DBD to bind to superhelical DNA suggests that it is capable of binding to nucleosomes, and that overlapping response elements may provide a mechanism to distinguish between p63 and p53 promoters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22247550      PMCID: PMC3293545          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.315820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  41 in total

1.  Derivation of the consensus DNA-binding sequence for p63 reveals unique requirements that are distinct from p53.

Authors:  Kori Ortt; Satrajit Sinha
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Relationships between p63 binding, DNA sequence, transcription activity, and biological function in human cells.

Authors:  Annie Yang; Zhou Zhu; Philipp Kapranov; Frank McKeon; George M Church; Thomas R Gingeras; Kevin Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  p53 binding to nucleosomes within the p21 promoter in vivo leads to nucleosome loss and transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Oleg Laptenko; Rachel Beckerman; Ella Freulich; Carol Prives
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Protein-protein crystal-packing contacts.

Authors:  O Carugo; P Argos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs.

Authors:  Malka Kitayner; Haim Rozenberg; Remo Rohs; Oded Suad; Dov Rabinovich; Barry Honig; Zippora Shakked
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 6.  The roles of p63 in cancer.

Authors:  Elsa R Flores
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Structure of the p53 core domain dimer bound to DNA.

Authors:  William C Ho; Mary X Fitzgerald; Ronen Marmorstein
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations.

Authors:  Y Cho; S Gorina; P D Jeffrey; N P Pavletich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Impact of Alu repeats on the evolution of human p53 binding sites.

Authors:  Feng Cui; Michael V Sirotin; Victor B Zhurkin
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  Conformational analysis of nucleic acids revisited: Curves+.

Authors:  R Lavery; M Moakher; J H Maddocks; D Petkeviciute; K Zakrzewska
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  A/T gap tolerance in the core sequence and flanking sequence requirements of non-canonical p53 response elements.

Authors:  Bi-He Cai; Chung-Faye Chao; Hwang-Chi Lin; Hua-Ying Huang; Reiji Kannagi; Jang-Yi Chen
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Crystal structures of the DNA-binding domain tetramer of the p53 tumor suppressor family member p73 bound to different full-site response elements.

Authors:  Abdul S Ethayathulla; H Thien Nguyen; Hector Viadiu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Structure-based predictions broadly link transcription factor mutations to gene expression changes in cancers.

Authors:  Justin Ashworth; Brady Bernard; Sheila Reynolds; Christopher L Plaisier; Ilya Shmulevich; Nitin S Baliga
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Structure and stability insights into tumour suppressor p53 evolutionary related proteins.

Authors:  Bruno Pagano; Abdullah Jama; Pierre Martinez; Ester Akanho; Tam T T Bui; Alex F Drake; Franca Fraternali; Penka V Nikolova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  ∆N-P63α and TA-P63α exhibit intrinsic differences in transactivation specificities that depend on distinct features of DNA target sites.

Authors:  Paola Monti; Yari Ciribilli; Alessandra Bisio; Giorgia Foggetti; Ivan Raimondi; Paola Campomenosi; Paola Menichini; Gilberto Fronza; Alberto Inga
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-04-30

6.  LADD syndrome with glaucoma is caused by a novel gene.

Authors:  Allie Simpson; Armin Avdic; Ben R Roos; Adam DeLuca; Kathy Miller; Michael J Schnieders; Todd E Scheetz; Wallace L M Alward; John H Fingert
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 7.  Structural diversity of p63 and p73 isoforms.

Authors:  Christian Osterburg; Volker Dötsch
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 12.067

8.  Transactivation specificity is conserved among p53 family proteins and depends on a response element sequence code.

Authors:  Yari Ciribilli; Paola Monti; Alessandra Bisio; H Thien Nguyen; Abdul S Ethayathulla; Ana Ramos; Giorgia Foggetti; Paola Menichini; Daniel Menendez; Michael A Resnick; Hector Viadiu; Gilberto Fronza; Alberto Inga
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  P53 family members modulate the expression of PRODH, but not PRODH2, via intronic p53 response elements.

Authors:  Ivan Raimondi; Yari Ciribilli; Paola Monti; Alessandra Bisio; Loredano Pollegioni; Gilberto Fronza; Alberto Inga; Paola Campomenosi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Solution structure and binding specificity of the p63 DNA binding domain.

Authors:  Andreas Enthart; Christian Klein; Alexander Dehner; Murray Coles; Gerd Gemmecker; Horst Kessler; Franz Hagn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.