Literature DB >> 11475389

Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states?

G W Torrance, D Feeny, W Furlong.   

Abstract

Visual analog scales (VASs) have long been used as a method of measuring preferences for health outcomes. They are easy and inexpensive to implement, can be administered quickly, and lend themselves to self-completion. Over time, however, disturbing questions have emerged concerning the validity of the VAS approach. This article reviews briefly the history, theory, practice, problems, and advantages of VASs; presents some suggestions to improve the validity of VASs; and recommends a limited but useful role for VASs in the process of measuring preferences for health states.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11475389     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  112 in total

1.  Understanding differences between self-ratings and population ratings for health in the EuroQOL.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development and initial validation of a new preference-based disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for erectile function.

Authors:  G W Torrance; M A Keresteci; R W Casey; A J Rosner; N Ryan; M C Breton
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Understanding health state valuations: a qualitative analysis of respondents' comments.

Authors:  Nancy J Devlin; Paul Hansen; Caroline Selai
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Using the effect size to model change in preference values from descriptive health status.

Authors:  Kristy Sanderson; Gavin Andrews; Justine Corry; Helen Lapsley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Validity of standard gamble utilities in patients referred for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Amjad I Hussain; Andrew M Garratt; Jan Otto Beitnes; Lars Gullestad; Kjell I Pettersen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Impact of Alzheimer's disease on the family caregiver's long-term quality of life: results from an ALSOVA follow-up study.

Authors:  Tarja H Välimäki; Janne A Martikainen; Kristiina Hongisto; Saku Väätäinen; Harri Sintonen; Anne M Koivisto
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A Norwegian 15D value algorithm: proposing a new procedure to estimate 15D value algorithms.

Authors:  Yvonne Anne Michel; Liv Ariane Augestad; Mathias Barra; Kim Rand
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: results from a EuroQol study in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Hong Wang; David A Kindig; John Mullahy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Health related quality of life in genital herpes: a pilot comparison of measures.

Authors:  D N Fisman
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Preference values associated with stage III colon cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jennie H Best; Louis P Garrison; William Hollingworth; Scott D Ramsey; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.