Literature DB >> 11475062

Evaluation of d2, a microsatellite measure of inbreeding and outbreeding, in wolves with a known pedigree.

P Hedrick1, R Fredrickson, H Ellegren.   

Abstract

We have evaluated a microsatellite measure proposed as an indicator of inbreeding and outbreeding using a captive wolf population with known inbreeding levels and founder sources. The measure, which is based on the difference in the repeat number for microsatellite alleles within an individual, was not more predictive of the known inbreeding coefficient than microsatellite heterozygosity (it was actually less predictive). We also found no support that the measure was predictive of the level of outbreeding. However, we could not determine if the measure was predictive of very low levels of inbreeding due to matings between remote relatives. Overall, it appears that the usefulness of this measure to identify individuals on the inbred-outbred continuum beyond that of heterozygosity and identify biologically important associations with fitness-related traits may be limited. We suggest that the measure be examined theoretically to determine when (and how much) the predictive value of the measure is different from that of heterozygosity for inbreeding or outbreeding levels in a variety of different scenarios.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11475062     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00646.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Heterosis, marker mutational processes and population inbreeding history.

Authors:  A Tsitrone; F Rousset; P David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Male heterozygosity predicts territory size, song structure and reproductive success in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Nathalie Seddon; William Amos; Raoul A Mulder; Joseph A Tobias
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Reduced heterozygosity impairs sperm quality in endangered mammals.

Authors:  John L Fitzpatrick; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  The effect of drought stress on heterozygosity-fitness correlations in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur).

Authors:  Guy Vranckx; Hans Jacquemyn; Joachim Mergeay; Karen Cox; Pieter Janssens; Bie An Sofie Gielen; Bart Muys; Olivier Honnay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Inbreeding depression and male fitness in black grouse.

Authors:  Jacob Höglund; Stuart B Piertney; Rauno V Alatalo; Johan Lindell; Arne Lundberg; Pekka T Rintamäki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Stabilizing selection on genomic divergence in a wild fish population.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The Relationship between Runs of Homozygosity and Inbreeding in Jersey Cattle under Selection.

Authors:  Eui-Soo Kim; Tad S Sonstegard; Curtis P Van Tassell; George Wiggans; Max F Rothschild
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does genetic diversity predict health in humans?

Authors:  Hanne C Lie; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hookworm infection, anaemia and genetic variability of the New Zealand sea lion.

Authors:  Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse; Laura Petetti; Padraig Duignan; Aurelie Castinel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Sex-specific correlations of individual heterozygosity, parasite load, and scalation asymmetry in a sexually dichromatic lizard.

Authors:  Pei-Jen L Shaner; Ying-Ru Chen; Jhan-Wei Lin; Jason J Kolbe; Si-Min Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.