Literature DB >> 11474925

Comparison of modelled and observed in vivo temperature elevations induced by focused ultrasound: implications for treatment planning.

K Mahoney1, T Fjield, N Mcdannold, G Clement, K Hynynen.   

Abstract

Two numerical models for predicting the temperature elevations resulting from focused ultrasound heating of muscle tissue were tested against experimental data. Both models use the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld integral to calculate the pressure field from a source distribution. The first method assumes a source distribution derived from a uniformly radiating transducer whereas the second uses a source distribution obtained by numerically projecting pressure field measurements from an area near the focus backward toward the transducer surface. Both of these calculated ultrasound fields were used as heat sources in the bioheat equation to calculate the temperature elevation in vivo. Experimental results were obtained from in vivo rabbit experiments using eight-element sector-vortex transducers at 1.61 and 1.7 MHz and noninvasive temperature mapping with MRI. Results showed that the uniformly radiating transducer model over-predicted the peak temperature by a factor ranging from 1.4 to 2.8, depending on the operating mode. Simulations run using the back-projected sources were much closer to experimental values, ranging from 1.0 to 1.7 times the experimental results, again varying with mode. Thus, a significant improvement in the treatment planning can be obtained by using actual measured ultrasound field distributions in combination with backward projection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11474925     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/7/304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Magnetic resonance tomography guided focussed ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) in tumor therapy--a new noninvasive therapy option].

Authors:  S A Hengst; T Ehrenstein; H Herzog; A Beck; I Utz-Billing; M David; R Felix; J Ricke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  The effect of electronically steering a phased array ultrasound transducer on near-field tissue heating.

Authors:  Allison Payne; Urvi Vyas; Nick Todd; Joshua de Bever; Douglas A Christensen; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  An analytical solution for improved HIFU SAR estimation.

Authors:  C R Dillon; U Vyas; A Payne; D A Christensen; R B Roemer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Effects of MRTI sampling characteristics on estimation of HIFU SAR and tissue thermal diffusivity.

Authors:  C R Dillon; N Todd; A Payne; D L Parker; D A Christensen; R B Roemer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Improving the heating efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound ablation through the use of phase change nanodroplets and multifocus sonication.

Authors:  Aparna Singh; A Gloria Nyankima; M Anthony Phipps; Vandiver Chaplin; Paul A Dayton; Charles Caskey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Transcranial phase aberration correction using beam simulations and MR-ARFI.

Authors:  Urvi Vyas; Elena Kaye; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A 63 element 1.75 dimensional ultrasound phased array for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Khaldon Y Saleh; Nadine Barrie Smith
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Collective guiding of acoustically propelled nano- and microparticles.

Authors:  Tobias Nitschke; Joakim Stenhammar; Raphael Wittkowski
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2022-05-14

9.  Comparison of computer simulations and clinical treatment results of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) of uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Mikko Hyvärinen; Yuexi Huang; Elizabeth David; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.506

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.