Literature DB >> 11469830

Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair.

A Wada1, H Kubota, K Miyanishi, H Hatanaka, H Miura, Y Iwamoto.   

Abstract

We evaluated a technique of four-strand double-modified locking Kessler flexor tendon repair in healing tendons. Seventy-two canine flexor digitorum profundus tendons in Zone 2 were repaired and evaluated following either active mobilization or immobilization at 0, 7, 14, 28 and 42 days after surgery. Fifty-six tendons were examined for gap and ultimate strength using a tensile testing machine and 16 were evaluated with standard hematoxylin and eosin, and Masson's trichrome staining. All tendons healed without rupture or gap formation of more than 1 mm, thus demonstrating that this repair technique has enough tensile strength to withstand early active mobilization. The gap and ultimate strength of actively mobilized tendons did not decrease significantly during the first 7 days, and were significantly greater than those of immobilized tendons throughout the 42-day study period. Actively mobilized tendons healed without the extrinsic adhesions and large tendon calluses that were found in immobilized tendons. Copyright 2001 The British Society for Surgery of the Hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11469830     DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Br        ISSN: 0266-7681


  23 in total

1.  The quadriga effect revisited: designing a "safety incision" to prevent tendon repair rupture and gap formation in a canine model in vitro.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Jun Ikeda; Peter C Amadio; Kai-Nan An; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Biomechanical comparison of double grasping repair versus cross-locked cruciate flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  C Liam Dwyer; D Dean Dominy; Timothy E Cooney; Richard Englund; Leonard Gordon; John D Lubahn
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

3.  Comparison of Barbed Sutures in Porcine Flexor Tenorrhaphy.

Authors:  Alan Sull; Serkan Inceoglu; Alicia August; Stephen Gregorius; Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-02

4.  Biomechanical analysis of knotless flexor tendon repair using large-diameter unidirection barbed suture.

Authors:  Toni E Lin; Chrisovalantis Lakhiani; Michael R Lee; Michel Saint-Cyr; Douglas M Sammer
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-09

5.  Metalloproteases and tendinopathy.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Francesco Oliva; Leonardo Osti; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2013-05-21

6.  Cellular and molecular factors in flexor tendon repair and adhesions: a histological and gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Subhash C Juneja; Edward M Schwarz; Regis J O'Keefe; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.417

7.  Surface treatment with 5-fluorouracil after flexor tendon repair in a canine in vivo model.

Authors:  Chunfeng Zhao; Mark E Zobitz; Yu-Long Sun; Kelly S Predmore; Peter C Amadio; Kai-Nan An; Steven L Moran
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The Effect of 1-Ethyl-3-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl) Carbodiimide Suture Coating on Tendon Repair Strength and Cell Viability in a Canine Model.

Authors:  Andrew R Thoreson; Ryo Hiwatari; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  The use of Teno Fix tendon repair device in a patient with multiple flexor tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Wade Daniel Kubat; John Hsu; Anahita Azharian; Mark Rekant
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2010-08-11

Review 10.  Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors-diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities in orthopedics.

Authors:  Björn Pasternak; Per Aspenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.