Literature DB >> 11459626

Symptom-based outcome measures for asthma: the use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences.

L McKenzie1, J Cairns, L Osman.   

Abstract

This paper reports on an application of discrete choice modelling to the measurement of patient preferences over asthma symptoms. A sample of patients with moderate to severe asthma was asked to choose between a series of pairs of scenarios characterised by different combinations of asthma symptoms. Their responses were analysed using a random effects ordered probit model. The results implied that patients weighted some symptoms more highly than others. Discrete choice modelling proved to be a useful approach for developing preference based outcome measures, although the results show how, in contexts where preferences over health care outcomes based on symptoms or some measure of health status are involved, a conventional linear additive model may not always be suitable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459626     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00128-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  12 in total

1.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics. For better or for worse?

Authors:  Stirling Bryan; Paul Dolan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-10

Review 2.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Asthma outcomes: symptoms.

Authors:  Jerry A Krishnan; Robert F Lemanske; Glorisa J Canino; Kurtis S Elward; Meyer Kattan; Elizabeth C Matsui; Herman Mitchell; E Rand Sutherland; Michael Minnicozzi
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Values for health states with different life durations.

Authors:  Luciana Scalone; Peep F M Stalmeier; Silvano Milani; Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies.

Authors:  Jessica Jaynes; Weng-Kee Wong; Hongquan Xu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Patient-centered care and its effect on outcomes in the treatment of asthma.

Authors:  Nashmia Qamar; Andrea A Pappalardo; Vineet M Arora; Valerie G Press
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2011-03-06

7.  Head-to-Head Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Health Values.

Authors:  Anna Selivanova; Erik Buskens; Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  A generalized measurement model to quantify health: the multi-attribute preference response model.

Authors:  Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multinational evidence of the applicability and robustness of discrete choice modeling for deriving EQ-5D-5L health-state values.

Authors:  Paul F M Krabbe; Nancy J Devlin; Elly A Stolk; Koonal K Shah; Mark Oppe; Ben van Hout; Elise H Quik; A Simon Pickard; Feng Xie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventions.

Authors:  Timea Mariann Helter; Christian Ernst Heinrich Boehler
Journal:  J Subst Use       Date:  2016-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.