Literature DB >> 25266301

Values for health states with different life durations.

Luciana Scalone1, Peep F M Stalmeier2, Silvano Milani3, Paul F M Krabbe4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent research suggests that the value of health states may depend on their duration, implying a more complex relationship between quality and quantity of life than the standard linear relationship assumed in the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) model.
OBJECTIVE: This study models how duration affects the value of health states, using discrete choice data.
METHODS: A study was conducted comprising health profiles including various durations. Health states were described with the EQ-5D. Duration was introduced as a sixth domain with six levels (1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 50 years). Sixty pairs of health profiles were selected, applying a Bayesian approach. Two hundred eight university students self-completed the computerized response tasks. Data were analyzed with a conditional logistic regression model.
RESULTS: There is clear evidence for non-linear values for duration, that is, preferences for duration are more accurately described by a logarithmic function.
CONCLUSIONS: In discrete choice experiments using health states with different durations, these data present the first evidence for decreasing marginal utility for duration. Our results suggest that refinement of the standard QALY framework may be needed for states with a long duration.

Keywords:  Discrete choice analysis; Duration; Health states; Quality-adjusted life years; Time preferences; Values

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25266301     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0634-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  20 in total

Review 1.  EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

Authors:  R Rabin; F de Charro
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic.

Authors:  Paul Dolan; Peep Stalmeier
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.

Authors:  James W Shaw; Jeffrey A Johnson; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead.

Authors:  Angela Robinson; Anne Spencer
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Using rank data to estimate health state utility models.

Authors:  Christopher McCabe; John Brazier; Peter Gilks; Aki Tsuchiya; Jennifer Roberts; Anthony O'Hagan; Katherine Stevens
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  On the assessment of preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences.

Authors:  Peep F M Stalmeier; Leida M Lamers; Jan J V Busschbach; Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Using DCE and ranking data to estimate cardinal values for health states for deriving a preference-based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  Julie Ratcliffe; John Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya; Tara Symonds; Martin Brown
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  A test of the QALY model when health varies over time.

Authors:  Anne Spencer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Symptom-based outcome measures for asthma: the use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences.

Authors:  L McKenzie; J Cairns; L Osman
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Modelling the EuroQol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling.

Authors:  Z Hakim; D S Pathak
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  6 in total

1.  Does Device or Connection Type Affect Health Preferences in Online Surveys?

Authors:  John D Hartman; Benjamin M Craig
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Mina Bahrampour; Joshua Byrnes; Richard Norman; Paul A Scuffham; Martin Downes
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-05-04

3.  A preference-based item response theory model to measure health: concept and mathematics of the multi-attribute preference response model.

Authors:  Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Edwin R van den Heuvel; Paul F M Krabbe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Developing a cerebral palsy-specific preference-based measure for a six-dimensional classification system (CP-6D): protocol for a valuation study.

Authors:  Mina Bahrampour; Richard Norman; Joshua Byrnes; Martin Downes; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol.

Authors:  Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Sanjeewa Kularatna; Joshua Byrnes; Brendan Mulhern; Gang Chen; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.