Literature DB >> 26823156

Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies.

Jessica Jaynes1, Weng-Kee Wong2, Hongquan Xu3.   

Abstract

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used for studying and quantifying subjects preferences in a wide variety of healthcare applications. They provide a rich source of data to assess real-life decision-making processes, which involve trade-offs between desirable characteristics pertaining to health and healthcare and identification of key attributes affecting healthcare. The choice of the design for a DCE is critical because it determines which attributes' effects and their interactions are identifiable. We apply blocked fractional factorial designs to construct DCEs and address some identification issues by utilizing the known structure of blocked fractional factorial designs. Our design techniques can be applied to several situations including DCEs where attributes have different number of levels. We demonstrate our design methodology using two healthcare studies to evaluate (i) asthma patients' preferences for symptom-based outcome measures and (ii) patient preference for breast screening services.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aliasing; blocked fractional factorial designs; interaction effects; locally optimal designs; multinomial logit model

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26823156      PMCID: PMC4893005          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  24 in total

1.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; A Brett Hauber; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Lloyd; Lisa A Prosser; Dean A Regier; F Reed Johnson; Josephine Mauskopf
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Preferences for new and existing contraceptive products.

Authors:  Denzil G Fiebig; Stephanie Knox; Rosalie Viney; Marion Haas; Deborah J Street
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Eliciting patients' preferences for epilepsy diagnostics: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  B F M Wijnen; R J A de Kinderen; A J Colon; C D Dirksen; B A B Essers; M Hiligsmann; F S S Leijten; P P W Ossenblok; S M A A Evers
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.937

4.  Symptom-based outcome measures for asthma: the use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences.

Authors:  L McKenzie; J Cairns; L Osman
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Women's preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: a population-based discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Margaret E Kruk; Magdalena Paczkowski; Godfrey Mbaruku; Helen de Pinho; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Mandy Ryan; Karen Gerard
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Karen Gerard; Michela Tinelli; Sue Latter; Alesha Smith; Alison Blenkinsopp
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Type 2 diabetes patients' preferences and willingness to pay for lifestyle programs: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Jorien Veldwijk; Mattijs S Lambooij; Paul F van Gils; Jeroen N Struijs; Henriëtte A Smit; G Ardine de Wit
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Benedict G Dellaert; Carmen D Dirksen; Trudy van der Weijden; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Yves Reginster; Verity Watson; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  5 in total

1.  Nonurgent Patients' Preferences for Emergency Department Versus General Practitioner and Effects of Incentives: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Yuliu Su; Shrutivandana Sharma; Semra Ozdemir; Wai Leng Chow; Hong-Choon Oh; Ling Tiah
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2021-07-09

2.  The impacts of potency, warning messages, and price on preferences for Cannabis flower products.

Authors:  Yuyan Shi; Ying Cao; Ce Shang; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-08-02

3.  Patients' Preferences Regarding Osteoarthritis Medications: An Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Basem Al-Omari; Peter McMeekin
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  US Privacy Laws Go Against Public Preferences and Impede Public Health and Research: Survey Study.

Authors:  Cason Schmit; Hye-Chung Kum; Theodoros Giannouchos; Mahin Ramezani; Qi Zheng; Michael A Morrisey
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 7.076

5.  Food Choices and Hypertension Among Rural Thais: Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Pimbucha Rusmevichientong; Helen Nguyen; Celina Morales; Jessica Jaynes; Michele M Wood
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.100

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.