Literature DB >> 11458242

Comparative radiologic study of bone density and cortical thickness of donor bone used in mandibular reconstruction.

H Myoung1, Y Y Kim, M S Heo, S S Lee, S C Choi, M J Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the total cancellous bone density, bone-implant interface density, and cortical thickness of 6 donor bone types commonly used in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction.
METHODS: A total of 120 bones from 20 Korean adults-including iliac bones, fibulas, cranial bones, scapulas, ribs, and clavicles-were selected. The implant recipient site was determined by the shape, contour, and anatomical limitations of the bones. The serial cross-sectional images of each bone were then acquired through computed tomography. Total cancellous bone density, bone-implant interface density around the imaginary implant fixture, and the cortical thickness along both sides of the imaginary fixture on each cross-sectional image were evaluated and compared.
RESULTS: The cancellous bone density of each donor bone type had a statistically significant difference. The cranial bone showed the highest cancellous bone density, followed by the iliac bone, clavicle, scapula, rib, and fibula (P <.05). The bone-implant interface density of the cranial bone, clavicle, fibula, and scapula each belonged to the same Duncan's group, whereas the rib and iliac bone showed lower bone-implant interface density. In average cortical thickness, the scapula and fibula had a thicker cortex surrounding the imaginary implant than the other bones, and the rib had the thinnest cortex.
CONCLUSION: Although more extensive testing is needed to explain the clinical implications of these results, the findings of this study may help clinicians choose the most appropriate donor bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11458242     DOI: 10.1067/moe.2001.115027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  8 in total

Review 1.  Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-21

2.  Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Thiyaneswaran Nesappan; Padma Ariga
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-08-20

3.  CORR Insights®: What Regions of the Distal Clavicle Have the Greatest Bone Mineral Density and Cortical Thickness? A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reconstruction of mandibular defects - clinical retrospective research over a 10-year period -.

Authors:  Majeed Rana; Riaz Warraich; Horst Kokemüller; Juliane Lemound; Harald Essig; Frank Tavassol; André Eckardt; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-04-28

5.  3D Finite Element Study on: Bar Splinted Implants Supporting Partial Denture in the Reconstructed Mandible.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Anwar; Rami Ghali; Mona Aboelnagga
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-09

6.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported crown in fibula bone model.

Authors:  Young-Seok Park; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  The Anatomical Variation of the Scapular Spine in A Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yimu Lin; Kaifeng Gan; Lei Zhang; Hongrui Wei; Xin Zhou; Hengshu Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-23

8.  Classification and Morphological Parameters of the Scapular Spine: Implications for Surgery.

Authors:  Hua-Jun Wang; Hugo Giambini; Da-Biao Hou; Song-Wei Huan; Ning Liu; Jie Yang; Chao Chen; Yan-Ping Gao; Ru-Guo Shang; Yi-Kai Li; Zhen-Gang Zha
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.