J M Blazeby1, S T Brookes, D Alderson. 1. Division of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK. jmblazeby@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QL) data are useful to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. Accumulating evidence suggests that QL data may predict survival. AIMS: In this study we investigated if baseline QL scores and changes in QL scores before and after intervention are prognostic for patients with oesophageal cancer. PATIENTS: Between 1993 and 1995, 92 consecutive new patients with oesophageal cancer were studied; 89 were followed until death or the end of the study period (survival of seven patients was censored in May 1999). METHODS: All patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the dysphagia scale of the oesophageal module (EORTC QLQ-OES24) before treatment and at regular intervals throughout the study. Cox's proportional hazards models assessed the impact of baseline QL variables and changes in QL scores on survival. RESULTS: Cox's proportional hazards models, adjusting for associations between QL scores, age, and TNM stage, found that physical function at baseline was significantly associated with survival (p=0.002). An increase in physical function score of 10 points corresponded to a 12% reduction in the likelihood of death at any given time (95% confidence intervals 4--18%). Further exploratory multivariable analyses suggested that improvement in emotional function six months after treatment was significantly related to longer survival (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence to support a relationship between patient rated scores of QL and survival. Further understanding of the associations between QL and clinical variables is needed.
BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QL) data are useful to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. Accumulating evidence suggests that QL data may predict survival. AIMS: In this study we investigated if baseline QL scores and changes in QL scores before and after intervention are prognostic for patients with oesophageal cancer. PATIENTS: Between 1993 and 1995, 92 consecutive new patients with oesophageal cancer were studied; 89 were followed until death or the end of the study period (survival of seven patients was censored in May 1999). METHODS: All patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the dysphagia scale of the oesophageal module (EORTC QLQ-OES24) before treatment and at regular intervals throughout the study. Cox's proportional hazards models assessed the impact of baseline QL variables and changes in QL scores on survival. RESULTS: Cox's proportional hazards models, adjusting for associations between QL scores, age, and TNM stage, found that physical function at baseline was significantly associated with survival (p=0.002). An increase in physical function score of 10 points corresponded to a 12% reduction in the likelihood of death at any given time (95% confidence intervals 4--18%). Further exploratory multivariable analyses suggested that improvement in emotional function six months after treatment was significantly related to longer survival (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence to support a relationship between patient rated scores of QL and survival. Further understanding of the associations between QL and clinical variables is needed.
Authors: J A Kramer; D Curran; M Piccart; J C de Haes; P Bruning; J Klijn; I Van Hoorebeeck; R Paridaens Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: A Coates; D Thomson; G R McLeod; P Hersey; P G Gill; I N Olver; R Kefford; R M Lowenthal; G Beadle; E Walpole Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1993 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: M C Stauder; Y Romero; B Kabat; P J Atherton; D Geno; C Deschamps; A Jatoi; J A Sloan; M Botros; K W Jung; A S Arora; R C Miller Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-07-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mark van Heijl; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Angela G E M de Boer; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Hans B Reitsma; Olivier R C Busch; Hugo W Tilanus; Jan J B van Lanschot; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 5.344