BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between clinical outcome, quality of life and cost for treatment modalities commonly employed in the management of oesophageal carcinoma. METHODS: A series of 51 patients diagnosed with oesophageal carcinoma in a 6-month period was used to derive a cost analysis profile for their treatment. All patients underwent quality of life assessment. Patients diagnosed in 1993 and managed in Newcastle upon Tyne were identified from the Northern Cancer Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics. Intervention profiles were documented for a 3-year follow-up period and cost analysis was conducted. A further 51 patients were recruited prospectively for quality-of-life studies. RESULTS: Some 139 individuals were identified retrospectively. Median survival was significantly better in patients treated by resection (n=31; median 20 months) than in those receiving palliative treatments (n=108; median 6 months) (P < 00001). Median cost was significantly greater in individuals who underwent resection (8070 pound sterling) than for patients subjected to a palliative strategy (radiotherapy 4720 pound sterling, brachytherapy 1790 pound sterling, laser 3540 pound sterling, intubation 2450 pound sterling, no treatment 1390 pound sterling) (P < 0.01). When considering the median cost per month of life (after treatment) resection (457 pound sterling) compared favourably with the palliative options (range 342-1125 pound sterling). CONCLUSION: Surgical resection for oesophageal carcinoma confers greatest benefit in terms of survival. Costs are inherently greater in individuals undergoing resection but, allowing for time, resection is at least as cost-effective as other treatment modalities.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between clinical outcome, quality of life and cost for treatment modalities commonly employed in the management of oesophageal carcinoma. METHODS: A series of 51 patients diagnosed with oesophageal carcinoma in a 6-month period was used to derive a cost analysis profile for their treatment. All patients underwent quality of life assessment. Patients diagnosed in 1993 and managed in Newcastle upon Tyne were identified from the Northern Cancer Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics. Intervention profiles were documented for a 3-year follow-up period and cost analysis was conducted. A further 51 patients were recruited prospectively for quality-of-life studies. RESULTS: Some 139 individuals were identified retrospectively. Median survival was significantly better in patients treated by resection (n=31; median 20 months) than in those receiving palliative treatments (n=108; median 6 months) (P < 00001). Median cost was significantly greater in individuals who underwent resection (8070 pound sterling) than for patients subjected to a palliative strategy (radiotherapy 4720 pound sterling, brachytherapy 1790 pound sterling, laser 3540 pound sterling, intubation 2450 pound sterling, no treatment 1390 pound sterling) (P < 0.01). When considering the median cost per month of life (after treatment) resection (457 pound sterling) compared favourably with the palliative options (range 342-1125 pound sterling). CONCLUSION: Surgical resection for oesophageal carcinoma confers greatest benefit in terms of survival. Costs are inherently greater in individuals undergoing resection but, allowing for time, resection is at least as cost-effective as other treatment modalities.