Literature DB >> 11450418

The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status.

S Sahin1, M C Cehreli.   

Abstract

The clinical and laboratory procedures employed for framework fabrication are inadequate to provide an absolute passive fit for implant-supported fixed superstructures. Although some prosthetic complications are attributed to the lack of passive fit, its effect on implant success is questionable. Nevertheless, the clinical results of increasing applications of advanced technology to improve framework fit seem promising. This article reviews the clinical significance of passive fit and the factors that affect the final fit of implant-supported frameworks.

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11450418     DOI： 10.1097/00008505-200104000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN： 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro.

Authors:  Jan-Frederik Güth; Daniel Edelhoff; Josef Schweiger; Christine Keul
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.

Authors:  Christine Keul; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Wear behavior of different double-crown systems.

Authors:  Jörg Engels; Oliver Schubert; Jan-Frederik Güth; Matthias Hoffmann; Christian Jauernig; Kurt Erdelt; Michael Stimmelmayr; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Randomised study for the 1-year crestal bone maintenance around modified diameter implants with different loading protocols: a radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Pietro Tortora; Alessandro Quaranta; Vittoria Perrotti; Iole Vozza; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Randomized trial investigating zirconia electroplated telescopic retainers: quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Ulrich Karl Deisenhofer; Anne-Christiane Séché; Franziska Lehmann; Peter Rammelsberg; Thomas Stober
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Photoelastic stress analysis in prosthetic implants of different diameters: mini, narrow, standard or wide.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Alves Aldiéris Pesqueira; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Marcela Filié Haddad; Amália Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

9.  Radiological evaluation of the Cresco system in combination with Osseospeed implants: a preliminary 3-year report.

Authors:  N Baldini; M DE Sanctis; M C Cagidiaco; P Balleri; F Vignoletti; C Goracci; M Ferrari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

10.  Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Arndt Happe; Markus Schlee; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.