Literature DB >> 11446561

Multisite quantitative ultrasound: precision, age- and menopause-related changes, fracture discrimination, and T-score equivalence with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

K M Knapp1, G M Blake, T D Spector, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical utility of a new multisite ultrasound device capable of measuring speed of sound (SOS) at the phalanx, radius, tibia and metatarsal. The in vitro and in vivo short- and long-term precision were evaluated, reference data were collected for 409 healthy white women (236 premenopausal and 173 postmenopausal), and age and menopause related changes were calculated using linear regression. Fracture discrimination was evaluated using 109 women with vertebral fractures and the age-adjusted odds ratios calculated for each standard deviation decrease in SOS measurement. Correlations between SOS measurements and spine and femur bone mineral density (BMD) were calculated. T-score equivalence with BMD was also investigated together with the prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by the WHO criteria. The in vivo short-term precision standardized in T-score units ranged from 0.14 to 0.33 and long-term standardized precision was 0.35-0.65. Postmenopausal age-related bone loss expressed as the annual change in T-score ranged from 0.040 to 0.089 for SOS and 0.053 to 0.066 for BMD, whilst menopause-related annual loss ranged from 0.036 to 0.094 for SOS and 0.050 to 0.074 for BMD. Correlations between the different SOS sites ranged from r = 0.24 to 0.55, and between SOS and BMD from r = 0.12 to 0.47. The odds ratio (and 95% confidence intervals) for fracture per 1 SD decrease in SOS were 2.0 (1.22 to 3.23) for the phalanx; 1.5 (1.01 to 2.24) for the metatarsal; 1.4 (1.03 to 1.99) for the radius and 1.2 (0.87 to 1.66) for the tibia. Odds ratios for BMD in the same population ranged from 2.6 to 4.8 (1.70 to 8.29). The prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by T = <-2.5 in the age range 60-69 ranged from 7.1% to 20.6% for SOS and 6.4% to 12.1% for BMD. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that multisite ultrasound has adequate precision for investigating skeletal status, is capable of differentiating between pre- and postmenopausal women and women with vertebral fractures, has a T-score equivalence similar to that of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and appears to be a promising new technique for evaluating skeletal status at clinically relevant sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11446561     DOI: 10.1007/s001980170090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  28 in total

1.  Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?

Authors:  Masako Ito; Akifumi Nishida; Jun Kono; Mika Kono; Masataka Uetani; Kuniaki Hayashi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  [Quantitative ultrasound].

Authors:  R Barkmann; C-C Glüer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Longitudinal monitoring of bone accretion measured by quantitative multi-site ultrasound (QUS) of bones in patients with delayed puberty (a pilot study).

Authors:  Zvi Zadik; Tali Sinai; Ella Borondukov; Amnon Zung; Irit Yaniv; Ram Reifen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Age curves of bone mineral density at the distal radius and calcaneus in Koreans.

Authors:  Jin-Young Min; Kyoung-Bok Min; Domyung Paek; Daehee Kang; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  The effect of calcium intake and physical activity on bone quantitative ultrasound measurements in children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Dario Prais; Gary Diamond; Avi Kattan; Jacob Salzberg; Dov Inbar
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-05-11       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Horticultural activity predicts later localized limb status in a contemporary pre-industrial population.

Authors:  Jonathan Stieglitz; Benjamin C Trumble; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Bone measurements of infants in the first 3 months of life by quantitative ultrasound: the influence of gestational age, season, and postnatal age.

Authors:  Xiang-Peng Liao; Wei-Li Zhang; Jiamin He; Jian-Hua Sun; Ping Huang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-05-12

8.  Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA.

Authors:  R B Cook; D Collins; J Tucker; P Zioupos
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound technology and dual energy X-ray densitometry in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: influence of sex and menopausal status.

Authors:  V Camozzi; F Lumachi; F Mantero; M Piccolo; G Luisetto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; K Perisinakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.