Literature DB >> 11444748

Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

M J Rosen1, J A Malm, M Tarnoff, K Zuccala, J L Ponsky.   

Abstract

The merits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy include faster recovery, less postoperative pain, earlier return to work, and decreased cost. However, there are few economic data comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory versus overnight stay setting. In a 12-month period, 74 consecutive cholecystectomies were performed laparoscopically by one surgeon. The ambulatory group consisted of 36 patients who were discharged from the hospital the same day after a mean recovery time of 5 hours (range, 2.25-10.33). Of the remaining 38 patients, 19 were admitted after surgery on 23-hour observation status, and 19 were inpatients. The average hospital cost was significantly less in the ambulatory group than in the observation group, with an 11% mean reduction in cost per patient (P = 0.0061). No patient in either group was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in an outpatient setting. The cost savings of ambulatory care versus observation are clearly shown in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11444748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  18 in total

1.  Profiling hospital performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the administrative data of four teaching hospitals in Japan.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirose; Yuichi Imanaka; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Miho Sekimoto; Yoshiaki Harada; Kazuaki Kuwabara; Kenshi Hayashida; Eun-Hwan Oh; S Edward Evans
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with high BMI: Experience from a UK centre.

Authors:  A Tandon; G Sunderland; Q M Nunes; N Misra; M Shrotri
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Institutional charges and disparities in outpatient brain biopsies in four US States: the State Ambulatory Database (SASD).

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; David W Roberts
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for selected patients?

Authors:  M Victorzon; P Tolonen; T Vuorialho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: training economic, and patient benefits.

Authors:  P K Jain; J D Hayden; P C Sedman; C M S Royston; C J O'Boyle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a conscious preference among Turkish patients with symptomatic gallstones?--prospective study.

Authors:  Asim Cingi; Fikret Düşünceli; Bahadir M Güllüoğlu; Cumhur Yeğen; A Ozdemir Aktan; Rifat Yalin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  An audit of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a Singapore institution: are we ready for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Alfred Wei Chieh Kow; Amanda Tan; Siew Pang Chan; Sow Fong Lee; Chung Yip Chan; Kui Hin Liau; Choon Kiat Ho
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  [Laparoscopy: potential and limitations in outpatient and short-term inpatient surgery].

Authors:  H Feussner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N Z Ahmad; G Byrnes; S A Naqvi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Replacement of expensive, disposable instruments with old-fashioned surgical techniques for improved cost-effectiveness in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  John E Morrison; Volker R Jacobs
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.