Literature DB >> 16333548

Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery.

J Zehetner1, A Kaltenbacher, W Wayand, A Shamiyeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of routinely performed laparoscopic operations causes the surgeons' "screen work" time to rise constantly. A new ergonomic workload on the surgeons' upper spine and shoulders is created as a result of the standard screen height position on top of the laparoscopy towers.
METHODS: Eight surgeons in the authors' surgical department were evaluated for the inclination/reclination angle of their cervical spine when using the laparoscopy towers in the authors' department and also at their favorable screen height.
RESULTS: The laparoscopy towers used in the authors' department made 3 degrees to 14 degrees reclination of the cervical spine necessary. The interviewed surgeons preferred a position of slight inclination, with a median of 160 cm measured from the central screen height to the floor.
CONCLUSION: Monitors of laparoscopy towers should be adapted to the surgeon's preferred screen height: at eye level frontally with a neutral or slight inclination of the cervical spine. The authors suggest a central screen height of 160 cm, with the monitor positioned in front of the surgeon. Newer equipment from the industry should be provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16333548     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0251-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  13 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; W D Smith; Y H Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons' upper extremity workload.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berquer; W D Smith; S Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Characterizing the "gold standard" image for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S I Brown; C White; K Wipat; G B Hanna; T G Frank; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study.

Authors:  U Matern; G Kuttler; C Giebmeyer; P Waller; M Faist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  U Matern; M Faist; K Kehl; C Giebmeyer; G Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures.

Authors:  R Berguer; G T Rab; H Abu-Ghaida; A Alarcon; J Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  6 in total

1.  The ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery: a quantitative study of the time and motion of laparoscopic surgeons in live surgical environments.

Authors:  Lucy Ping Aitchison; Cathy Kexin Cui; Amy Arnold; Erin Nesbitt-Hawes; Jason Abbott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.

Authors:  Liam A Haveran; Yuri W Novitsky; Donald R Czerniach; Gordie K Kaban; Melinda Taylor; Karen Gallagher-Dorval; Richard Schmidt; John J Kelly; Demetrius E M Litwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ergonomics in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Survey of the North American Skull Base Society.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mattogno; Filippo Marciano; Michael P Catalino; Davide Mattavelli; Paola Cocca; Nicola Francesco Lopomo; Piero Nicolai; Edward R Laws; Ian Witterick; Shaan M Raza; Anand K Devaiah; Liverana Lauretti; Alessandro Olivi; Marco M Fontanella; Fred Gentili; Francesco Doglietto
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 4.  Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; E R Totté; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Objective ergonomic risk assessment of wrist and spine with motion analysis technique during simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy in experienced and novice surgeons.

Authors:  Twinkle Yogesh Dabholkar; Sujata Sudhir Yardi; Sanjay Narahari Oak; Sneha Ramchandani
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants.

Authors:  Baptiste Marçon; Willy Ngueyon Sime; Francis Guillemin; Nicolas Hubert; François Lagrange; Céline Huselstein; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-09-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.