Literature DB >> 9918608

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: beyond the learning curve.

N J Keeling1, D Menzies, R W Motson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bile duct clearance at open cholecystectomy had become normal surgical practice before the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, perceived technical difficulties have deterred many surgeons from treating common bile duct stones at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This has led to a reliance on preoperative clearance of ducts known to have stones and postoperative clearance of ducts found to have stones at operation or those that subsequently develop complications of retained stones.
METHODS: The authors describe a series of 120 consecutive bile duct explorations carried out between April 1991 and February 1997 in a series of 1,237 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic exploration and clearance of the bile ducts was achieved in 89% of cases in the whole series, and 97% success was attained in the last 60 cases, which also were associated with a decrease in operating time.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that for surgeons familiar with open common bile duct exploration and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the next logical step is laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct at the time of cholecystectomy, which is safe and readily mastered.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9918608     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency in general surgery.

Authors:  V Bresadola; S Intini; G Terrosu; U Baccarani; M G Marcellino; M Sistu; F Scanavacca; F Bresadola
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The significance of cystic duct stones encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Mahmud; Y Hamza; A H Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; Nikhil Gupta; Vinod Kumar Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Hamish Noble; Elise Whitley; Sally Norton; Michael Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Common bile duct exploration in an elderly Asian population.

Authors:  Vishal G Shelat; Vincent J M Chia; JeeKeem Low
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

6.  The use of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for complicated cholelithiasis.

Authors:  J A E Philips; D A Lawes; A J Cook; T H Arulampalam; A Zaborsky; D Menzies; R W Motson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Learning curve for performing choledochotomy bile duct exploration with primary closure after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Hengqing Zhu; Linquan Wu; Rongfa Yuan; Yu Wang; Wenjun Liao; Jun Lei; Jianghua Shao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Anand Narayan Singh; Ragini Kilambi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Development of a training model for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Alexis Sánchez; Omaira Rodríguez; Gustavo Benítez; Renata Sánchez; Liliana De la Fuente
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration four-task training model: construct validity.

Authors:  Alexis Sánchez; Natalia Otaño; Omaira Rodríguez; Renata Sánchez; Gustavo Benítez; Michael Schweitzer
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.