Literature DB >> 11442184

Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

R P Singh1, I Goldberg, S L Graham, A Sharma, M Mohsin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess possible correlations between central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventeen eyes of 117 patients who were not taking any intraocular pressure-lowering medications were studied prospectively. Forty-one patients had ocular hypertension; 13 patients had primary open-angle glaucoma; and 10 patients had normal-pressure glaucoma. Twenty-three healthy eyes were included. Thirty glaucoma suspects (10 patients monitored for possible normal-pressure glaucoma and 20 patients with intermittent ocular hypertension) were included for correlation analysis. Tonometry was performed with Goldmann applanation and pneumotonometry, and central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and axial length were measured ultrasonically.
RESULTS: Central corneal thickness was lowest in eyes with normal-pressure glaucoma (538 +/- 51 microm), highest in eyes with ocular hypertension (570 +/- 32 microm), and intermediate and similar in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy eyes (547 +/- 34 microm and 554 +/- 32 microm, respectively). These differences were significant (P = 0.028). Goldmann applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness were weakly correlated (r = 0.12, P = 0.205), with a 0.2-mm Hg change per 10-microm variation in central corneal thickness. Pneumotonometry measurements were more strongly correlated with central corneal thickness (r = 0.21, P < 0.05). Lens thickness was strongly correlated with age (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). Anterior chamber depth was negatively correlated with lens thickness and age (r = -0.29, P < 0.005 and r = -0.25, P < 0.01). Axial length was correlated with anterior chamber depth and age (r = 0.5, P < .001 and r = -0.19, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Eyes diagnosed as having ocular hypertension have thicker corneas and eyes labeled as having normal-pressure glaucoma have thinner corneas, when compared with healthy eyes or eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. The effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry accuracy appears to be small and usually not clinically relevant. When corneal thickness is markedly different from normal, the clinician may need to factor this into diagnosis and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11442184     DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200106000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  Central corneal thickness as a predictor of visual field loss in primary open angle glaucoma for a Hispanic population.

Authors:  Jorge L Fernandez-Bahamonde; Christian Roman-Rodriguez; Maria C Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.975

2.  Central corneal thickness and correlation to optic disc size: a potential link for susceptibility to glaucoma.

Authors:  M Pakravan; A Parsa; M Sanagou; C F Parsa
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; T Newson; A El Sheikh; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.

Authors:  Federico Saenz-Frances; Claudia Sanz-Pozo; Lara Borrego-Sanz; Luis Jañez; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Sanchez; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Enrique Santos-Bueso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states.

Authors:  Christoph Kniestedt; Michelle Nee; Robert L Stamper
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Central corneal thickness in black Cameroonian ocular hypertensive and glaucomatous subjects.

Authors:  Christelle Domngang Noche; André Omgbwa Eballe; Assumpta Lucienne Bella
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-24

7.  Comparison between central corneal thickness and IOP in patients with macrodiscs with physiologic macrocup and normal-sized vital discs.

Authors:  Arne Viestenz; Nina Wakili; Anselm G M Jünemann; Folkert K Horn; Christian Y Mardin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Relationship between central corneal thickness and visual field defect in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Wenzhong Lin; Yumiko Aoyama; Kazuhide Kawase; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  [Correction factors for central corneal thickness in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  A Kutschan; B Schroeder; A Hager; H Dave; K Wegscheider; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Differences in ocular dimensions between normal and dry eyes.

Authors:  Juan A Sanchis-Gimeno; Manuel Herrera; Franzisco Sánchez-del-Campo; Francisco Martínez-Soriano
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.