Literature DB >> 19343420

The trade-off between flexibility and maneuverability: task performance with articulating laparoscopic instruments.

Danny V Martinec1, Prakash Gatta, Bin Zheng, Peter M Denk, Lee L Swanström.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic instruments are rigid and thus cannot provide the degrees of freedom (DOF) needed by a surgeon in certain situations. A new generation of laparoscopic instruments with the ability to articulate their end effectors is available. Although these instruments offer the flexibility needed to perform complex tasks in a constricted surgical site, their control may be hampered by their increased complexity.
METHODS: This study compared the task performance between articulating and conventional laparoscopic instruments. Surgeons with extensive laparoscopic experience (8 experts) and staff with no surgical experience (8 novices) were recruited for the test. Both groups were required to perform three standardized tasks (peg transfer, left-to-right suturing, and up-and-down suturing) in a bench top model using conventional and articulating instruments. Performance was scored using a standardized 100-point scale based on movement speed and accuracy. After the initial trials with conventional and articulating instruments, each participant was given a short orientation on how to use the articulating instrument advantageously. The participant then was retested with the articulating instrument.
RESULTS: As expected, the expert group scored significantly better than the novice group (p < 0.001). The combined data from both groups showed better performance with the conventional instruments than with the articulating instruments (p = 0.074). The experts maintained their proficient laparoscopic performance using conventional instruments in their first attempts with the articulating instruments (91 vs. 84), whereas the novices had greater difficulty with the articulating instruments than with the conventional instruments (46 vs. 59). After a short orientation, however, the novices outscored the expert group in terms of net improvement in performance with the articulating instrument (27 vs. 1% improvement).
CONCLUSION: Experienced surgeons are readily able to transfer their skills from conventional to articulating laparoscopic instruments. To speed the learning process, the use of articulating instruments can be started at an early stage of surgical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19343420     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0462-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Problems with laparoscopic instruments: opinions of experts.

Authors:  K T den Boer; T de Jong; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use?

Authors:  Liane S Feldman; Vadim Sherman; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Robotics in surgery.

Authors:  Simon Bann; Mansoor Khan; Juan Hernandez; Yaron Munz; Krishna Moorthy; Vivek Datta; Timothy Rockall; Ara Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity.

Authors:  Ramon Berguer; Warren Smith
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Gerald M Fried; Kaaren I Hoffman; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  The future of sugical simulation and surgical robotics.

Authors:  Richard M Satava
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-03

7.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Establishing a simulation center for surgical skills: what to do and how to do it.

Authors:  R S Haluck; R M Satava; G Fried; C Lake; E M Ritter; A K Sachdeva; N E Seymour; M L Terry; D Wilks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 3.453

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Daniel Enter; Nathaniel J Soper; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Performance analysis on physical simulator of four different instrument setups in laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery.

Authors:  Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo; Ana Maria Matos-Azevedo; Francisco Julián Pérez-Duarte; Silvia Enciso; Idoia Díaz-Guëmes Martín-Portugués
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Surgical team composition differs between laparoscopic and open procedures.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Eric Fung; Bo Fu; Neely M Panton; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Effect of training and instrument type on performance in single-incision laparoscopy: results of a randomized comparison using a surgical simulator.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Taylor J Reif; Nathaniel J Soper; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Assessment of joystick and wrist control in hand-held articulated laparoscopic prototypes.

Authors:  Linde M Okken; Magdalena K Chmarra; Ellen Hiemstra; Frank Willem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum.

Authors:  Daniel Uysal; Claudia Gasch; Rouven Behnisch; Felix Nickel; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Markus Hohenfellner; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Maneuverability of the Scope and Instruments within Three Different Single-Incision Laparoscopic Ports: An Experimental Pilot Study.

Authors:  Georg Haider; Ursula Schulz; Nikola Katic; Christian Peham; Gilles Dupré
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Assessment of an Articulating Laparoscopic Needle Holder (FlexDex™) Compared to a Conventional Rigid Needle Holder in 2-Dimension Vision Amongst Novices: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Authors:  Nima Motahariasl; Sayed Borna Farzaneh; Sina Motahariasl; Ilya Kokotkin; Sara Sousi; Alexander Zargaran; David Zargaran; Bijendra Patel
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-02-04

9.  Comparison of two cable configurations in 3D printed steerable instruments for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Costanza Culmone; Remi van Starkenburg; Gerwin Smit; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 10.  Laparoscopy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence.

Authors:  Prabudh Goel; Ashoke K Basu
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-06-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.