Literature DB >> 11439214

Tolerances for the accuracy of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems.

J Venselaar1, H Welleweerd, B Mijnheer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To design a consistent set of criteria for acceptability of photon beam dose calculations of treatment planning systems. The set should be applicable in combination with a test package used for evaluation of a treatment planning system, such as the ones proposed by the AAPM Task Group 23 or by the Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry.
RESULTS: Tolerances have been defined for the accuracy with which a treatment planning system should be able to calculate the dose in different parts of a photon beam: the central beam axis and regions with large and small dose gradients. For increasing complexity of the geometry, wider tolerances are allowed, varying between 2 and 5%. For the evaluation of a large number of data points an additional quantity, the confidence limit, has been introduced, which combines the influence of systematic and random deviations. The proposed tolerances have been compared with other recommendations for a number of clinically relevant examples, showing considerable differences, which are partly due to the way the complexity of the geometry is taken into account. Furthermore differences occur if criteria for acceptability of dose calculations are related either to the local dose value or to a normalized dose value.
CONCLUSIONS: Although it is acknowledged that the general aim must be to have good agreement between dose calculation and the actual dose value, e.g. within 2% or 2 mm, current day algorithms and their implementation into commercial treatment planning systems result often in larger deviations. A high accuracy can at present only be achieved in relatively simple cases. The new set of tolerances and the quantity confidence limit have proven to be useful tools for the acceptance of photon beam dose calculation algorithms of treatment planning systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11439214     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00377-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  54 in total

1.  Dosimetric verification in inhomogeneous phantom geometries for the XiO radiotherapy treatment planning system with 6-MV photon beams.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kohno; Satoshi Kitou; Eriko Hirano; Satoru Kameoka; Tomonori Goka; Teiji Nishio; Tomoko Miyagishi; Takaki Ariji; Mitsuhiko Kawashima; Takashi Ogino
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-25

2.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dose attenuation effect of hip prostheses in a 9-MV photon beam: commercial treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo calculations.

Authors:  Asghar Mesbahi; Farshad Seyed Nejad
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-12-25

4.  A mathematical approach to beam matching.

Authors:  B Sarkar; A Manikandan; M Nandy; M S Gossman; C S Sureka; A Ray; N Sujatha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Hounsfield units variations: impact on CT-density based conversion tables and their effects on dose distribution.

Authors:  B Zurl; R Tiefling; P Winkler; P Kindl; K S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Assessment of the setup dependence of detector response functions for mega-voltage linear accelerators.

Authors:  Christopher Fox; Tom Simon; Bill Simon; James F Dempsey; Darren Kahler; Jatinder R Palta; Chihray Liu; Guanghua Yan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Treatment planning of a skin-sparing conical breast brachytherapy applicator using conventional brachytherapy software.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Christopher S Melhus; Shirin Sioshansi; Mark J Rivard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Antony L Palmer; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  An institutional experience of quality assurance of a treatment planning system on photon beam.

Authors:  Yıldıray Ozgüven; Kadir Yaray; Fadime Alkaya; Birsen Yücel; Serdar Soyuer
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-12-08

10.  Beam data modeling of linear accelerators (linacs) through machine learning and its potential applications in fast and robust linac commissioning and quality assurance.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Ishan Patil; Bin Han; Yong Yang; Lei Xing; Emil Schüler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.