Literature DB >> 11436883

Fallout from recent articles on radiation dose and pediatric CT.

L F Donnelly1, D P Frush.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11436883     DOI： 10.1007/s002470100479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN： 0301-0449


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Paediatric CT dose: a multicentre audit of subspecialty practice in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  D Jackson; K Atkin; F Bettenay; J Clark; M R Ditchfield; J E Grimm; R Linke; G Long; E Onikul; J Pereira; M Phillips; F Wilson; E Paul; S K Goergen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians.

Authors:  Karen E Thomas; June E Parnell-Parmley; Salwa Haidar; Rahim Moineddin; Ellen Charkot; Guila BenDavid; Connie Krajewski
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-05-13

3.  Breast dose reduction for chest CT by modifying the scanning parameters based on the pre-scan size-specific dose estimate (SSDE).

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Takeshi Nakaura; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Kenichiro Hirata; Tomohiro Namimoto; Daisuke Sakabe; Masahiro Hatemura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Paediatric CT: the effects of increasing image noise on pulmonary nodule detection.

Authors:  Shonit Punwani; Jie Zhang; Warren Davies; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Paul Humphries
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-12-08

5.  Multislice CT of the head and body routine scans: Are scanning protocols adjusted for paediatric patients?

Authors:  Z Sun; Ks Al Ghamdi; Ih Baroum
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2012-01-01

6.  Ureteroscopy: The standard of care in the management of upper tract urolithiasis in children.

Authors:  Pramod P Reddy; William R Defoor
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-10

7.  Commentary: for the children's sake, avoid non-contrast CT.

Authors:  Kieran McHugh; Luisa Disini
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  Are Risks From Medical Imaging Still too Small to Be Observed or Nonexistent?

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.