Literature DB >> 11435830

Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies.

C S Stewart1, B C Leibovich, A L Weaver, M M Lieber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that markedly increasing the number of cores obtained during prostate needle biopsy may improve the cancer detection rate in men with persistent indications for repeat biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed saturation ultrasound guided transrectal prostate needle biopsy in 224 men under anesthesia in an outpatient surgical setting in whom previous negative biopsies had been performed in the office. The mean number of previous sextant biopsy sessions plus or minus standard deviation before saturation biopsy was 1.8 (range 1 to 7). A mean of 23 saturation biopsy cores (range 14 to 45) were distributed throughout the whole prostate, including the peripheral, medial and anterior regions. Indications for repeat biopsy were persistent elevated serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in 108 cases, persistent elevated PSA and abnormal rectal examination in 27, persistent abnormal rectal examination in 4, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the previous biopsy in 64 and atypia in the previous biopsy in 21.
RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 77 of 224 patients (34%). The number of previous negative sextant biopsies was not predictive of subsequent cancer detection by saturation biopsy. Median PSA was 8.7 ng./ml. and median PSA velocity was 0.63 ng./ml. yearly. Of the 77 patients in whom cancer was detected radical prostatectomy was performed in 52. Pathological stage was pT2 in 48 patients and pT3 in 4, while Gleason score was 4 to 5, 6 to 7 and 8 in 5, 46 and 1, respectively. At prostatectomy median cancer volume was 1.04 cc and 85.7% of removed tumors were clinically significant, assuming a 3-year doubling time. The overall complication rate for saturation needle biopsy was 12% and hematuria requiring hospital admission was the most common event.
CONCLUSIONS: Saturation needle biopsy of the prostate is a useful diagnostic technique in men at risk for prostate cancer with previous negative office biopsies. This technique allows adequate sampling of the whole prostate gland and has a detection rate of 34% in this cohort of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11435830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  73 in total

1.  [Standardised scoring of a multi-parametric 3-T MRI for a targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy].

Authors:  C Arsov; D Blondin; R Rabenalt; G Antoch; P Albers; M Quentin
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  CUA guidelines on prostate biopsy methodology.

Authors:  Assaad El-Hakim; Sabri Moussa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Shared gene expression alterations in prostate cancer and histologically benign prostate from patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Farhad Kosari; John C Cheville; Cristiane M Ida; R Jeffrey Karnes; Alexey A Leontovich; Thomas J Sebo; Sibel Erdogan; Erika Rodriguez; Stephen J Murphy; George Vasmatzis
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

6.  Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Green Tea Catechins for Prostate Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Nagi B Kumar; Julio Pow-Sang; Kathleen M Egan; Philippe E Spiess; Shohreh Dickinson; Raoul Salup; Mohamed Helal; Jerry McLarty; Christopher R Williams; Fred Schreiber; Howard L Parnes; Said Sebti; Aslam Kazi; Loveleen Kang; Gwen Quinn; Tiffany Smith; Binglin Yue; Karen Diaz; Ganna Chornokur; Theresa Crocker; Michael J Schell
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-04-14

7.  Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

8.  Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Abhinav Sidana; Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Srinivas Vourganti; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Akhil Muthigi; Mahir Maruf; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Jeffrey W Nix; Maria J Merino; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 9.  Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the radiologist.

Authors:  Richard Clements
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicolas B Delongchamps; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.