P. Clarys1, K. Alewaeters, R. Lambrecht, A. O. Barel. 1. Laboratory of General and Biological Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Two types of skin reflectance instruments are available nowadays for the determination of skin color: a tristumulus colorimeter (Chromameter from Minolta) using the CIE L*a*b* color system and the narrow-band simple reflectance meters (DermaSpectrometer from Cortex and Mexameter from Courage-Khazaka) using the erythema/melanin indices. The purpose of this study was to compare the capabilities of the three instruments (sensitivity, repeatability and correlation) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Comparative color measurements were carried out first in vitro on standardized color charts and subsequently in vivo on different skin areas in human volunteers. Skin color changes induced by various physico-chemical treatments were also quantitatively evaluated with the three instruments. RESULTS: The in vitro and in vivo repeatabilty as well as the sensitivity of the three instruments are rather good. Erythema and skin blanching could be readily quantified by the increase of the a* parameter and of the erythema indices of the simple reflectance meters. Natural UV tanning and artificial chemical tanning could be measured by the decrease of L* and increase of b* and of the melanin indices. CONCLUSION: The Chromameter and the two narrow-band reflectance instruments were able to characterize skin color and to quantify small skin color changes. Moderate to high significant linear correlations could be established between the CIE L*a*b* color parameters and the erythema/melanin indices.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Two types of skin reflectance instruments are available nowadays for the determination of skin color: a tristumulus colorimeter (Chromameter from Minolta) using the CIE L*a*b* color system and the narrow-band simple reflectance meters (DermaSpectrometer from Cortex and Mexameter from Courage-Khazaka) using the erythema/melanin indices. The purpose of this study was to compare the capabilities of the three instruments (sensitivity, repeatability and correlation) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Comparative color measurements were carried out first in vitro on standardized color charts and subsequently in vivo on different skin areas in human volunteers. Skin color changes induced by various physico-chemical treatments were also quantitatively evaluated with the three instruments. RESULTS: The in vitro and in vivo repeatabilty as well as the sensitivity of the three instruments are rather good. Erythema and skin blanching could be readily quantified by the increase of the a* parameter and of the erythema indices of the simple reflectance meters. Natural UV tanning and artificial chemical tanning could be measured by the decrease of L* and increase of b* and of the melanin indices. CONCLUSION: The Chromameter and the two narrow-band reflectance instruments were able to characterize skin color and to quantify small skin color changes. Moderate to high significant linear correlations could be established between the CIE L*a*b* color parameters and the erythema/melanin indices.
Authors: Ryan G Gamble; Nancy L Asdigian; Jenny Aalborg; Victoria Gonzalez; Neil F Box; Laura S Huff; Anna E Barón; Joseph G Morelli; Stefan T Mokrohisky; Lori A Crane; Robert P Dellavalle Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Kevin P Boyd; Liyan Gao; Rui Feng; Mark Beasley; Ludwine Messiaen; Bruce R Korf; Amy Theos Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Kimmie Ng; Jamil B Scott; Bettina F Drake; Andrew T Chan; Bruce W Hollis; Paulette D Chandler; Gary G Bennett; Edward L Giovannucci; Elizabeth Gonzalez-Suarez; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Karen M Emmons; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Rossybelle P Amorrortu; Neil A Fenske; Basil S Cherpelis; Laxmi Vijayan; Yayi Zhao; Juliana Balliu; Jane L Messina; Vernon K Sondak; Anna R Giuliano; Tim Waterboer; Michael Pawlita; Tarik Gheit; Massimo Tommasino; Dana E Rollison Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jolien Robijns; Sandrine Censabella; Stefan Claes; Luc Pannekoeke; Lore Bussé; Dora Colson; Iris Kaminski; Joy Lodewijckx; Paul Bulens; Annelies Maes; Leen Noé; Marc Brosens; An Timmermans; Ivo Lambrichts; Veerle Somers; Jeroen Mebis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jenny Aalborg; Joseph G Morelli; Stefan T Mokrohisky; Nancy L Asdigian; Tim E Byers; Robert P Dellavalle; Neil F Box; Lori A Crane Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2009-09
Authors: Robin Taylor Wilson; Alanna N Roff; P Jenny Dai; Tracey Fortugno; Jonathan Douds; Gang Chen; Gary L Grove; Sheila Ongeri Nikiforova; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Tony Frudakis; Vernon M Chinchilli; Terryl J Hartman; Laurence M Demers; Mark D Shriver; Victor A Canfield; Keith C Cheng Journal: Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig Date: 2011-09