Literature DB >> 11428555

Do safety practices differ between responders and non-responders to a safety questionnaire?

D Kendrick1, R Hapgood, P Marsh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare reported safety practices between responders and non-responders to a safety survey.
DESIGN: Cross sectional survey at baseline compared with safety practices reported at subsequent child health surveillance checks.
SUBJECTS: Parents of children aged 3-12 months registered with practices participating in a controlled trial of injury prevention in primary care that did, and did not, respond to the baseline survey and who subsequently attended child health surveillance checks.
RESULTS: No difference in safety practices was found between responders and non-responders to the survey at the 6-9 month check. Responders were more likely to report owning a stair gate (odds ratio (OR) 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82 to 4.16) and socket covers (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.04) at the 12-15 month check, and owning socket covers (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.61) at the 18-24 month check. Responders were more likely to report greater than the median number of safety practices at the 18 month check.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-responders to a safety survey appear to be less likely to report owning several items of safety equipment than responders. Further work is needed to confirm these findings. Extrapolating the results of safety surveys to the population as a whole may lead to over estimation of safety equipment possession.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11428555      PMCID: PMC1730730          DOI: 10.1136/ip.7.2.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  18 in total

1.  Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey.

Authors:  A Hill; J Roberts; P Ewings; D Gunnell
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1997-06

2.  You can't believe all that you're told: the issue of unvalidated questionnaires.

Authors:  I Scott
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Child health clincs and inverse care laws: evidence from longitudinal study of 1878 pre-school children.

Authors:  P M Zinkin; C A Cox
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-08-14

4.  The study population: general characteristics and potential confounding factors.

Authors:  J H Brussaard; H A Brants; M Bouman; M R Löwik
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Deprivation and health in one general practice.

Authors:  G N Marsh; D M Channing
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-05-03

6.  Uptake of immunisation in district health authorities in England.

Authors:  B Jarman; N Bosanquet; P Rice; N Dollimore; B Leese
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-06-25

7.  Mothers' attitudes to a child health clinic in a deprived area of Nottingham.

Authors:  J Karmali; R J Madeley
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.427

8.  Measles immunization. Some factors affecting non-acceptance of vaccine.

Authors:  N Adjaye
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.427

9.  Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents to a mailed questionnaire.

Authors:  J Barton; C Bain; C H Hennekens; B Rosner; C Belanger; A Roth; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Preventing injuries in children: cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  D Kendrick; P Marsh; K Fielding; P Miller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Watson; D Kendrick; C Coupland
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Validation of parent self reported home safety practices.

Authors:  A S Robertson; F P Rivara; B E Ebel; J F Lymp; D A Christakis
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Why do parents with toddlers store poisonous products safely?

Authors:  Tinneke M J Beirens; Eduard F van Beeck; Johannes Brug; Paul den Hertog; Hein Raat
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.