M Watson1, D Kendrick, C Coupland. 1. Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham. michael.watson@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure the validity of self reported safety practices from a questionnaire, completed by families participating in a home safety randomised controlled trial. METHODS: The postal questionnaire was used to measure secondary outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. The answers to 26 questions that could be assessed by observation were checked by a home visit. Families were invited to take part in a "home safety check"; they were not told that the visit was part of a validation study. At the time of the visit the researcher was blind to the self reports in the questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty four questionnaires were validated by visits to 64 households. Percentage agreement ranged from 58% to 100%. Sensitivity was high (68% or above) for most safety practices. The positive predictive value was also high for most safety practices (78% or above for 15 of the 16 practices). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a fairly high degree of consistency between self reported data and actual observations. The findings from this relatively small study need confirmation from larger studies.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To measure the validity of self reported safety practices from a questionnaire, completed by families participating in a home safety randomised controlled trial. METHODS: The postal questionnaire was used to measure secondary outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. The answers to 26 questions that could be assessed by observation were checked by a home visit. Families were invited to take part in a "home safety check"; they were not told that the visit was part of a validation study. At the time of the visit the researcher was blind to the self reports in the questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty four questionnaires were validated by visits to 64 households. Percentage agreement ranged from 58% to 100%. Sensitivity was high (68% or above) for most safety practices. The positive predictive value was also high for most safety practices (78% or above for 15 of the 16 practices). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a fairly high degree of consistency between self reported data and actual observations. The findings from this relatively small study need confirmation from larger studies.
Authors: Carolyn Diguiseppi; Cynthia W Goss; Lihong Dao; Amanda Allshouse; Robert A Bardwell; Edward Hendrikson; Shelly L Miller; Jill Litt Journal: J Community Health Date: 2012-02
Authors: Wendy C Shields; Eileen M McDonald; Lara McKenzie; Mei-Cheng Wang; Allen R Walker; Andrea C Gielen Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Nancy E Sherwood; Rona L Levy; Shelby L Langer; Meghan M Senso; A Lauren Crain; Marcia G Hayes; Julie D Anderson; Elisabeth M Seburg; Robert W Jeffery Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 2.226