Literature DB >> 11424653

The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.

Y Jiang1, M M Chun.   

Abstract

Both spatial and temporal selection require focused attention. The authors examine how temporal attention affects spatial selection. In a dual-task rapid serial visual presentation paradigm, temporal selection of a target (T1) impairs processing of a second target (T2) that follows T1 within 500 ms. This process is the attentional blink (AB). To test the effects of withdrawing temporal attention, the authors measured concurrent distractor interference on T2 when the distractors were presented during and outside of the AB. Perceptual interference was manipulated by the similarity in color between T2 and concurrent distractors, and response interference was manipulated by the flanker congruency task. Results showed that perceptual interference was larger during the AB. Response interference also increased during the AB, but only when perceptual interference was high. The authors conclude that temporal selection and spatial selection rely on a common attentional process.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11424653     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.3.664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Pierre Jolicoeur; Paola Sessa; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Nicolas Robitaille
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

2.  Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Benoit Brisson; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

3.  Top-down control is not lost in the attentional blink: evidence from intact endogenous cueing.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Liping Shao; Mark Nieuwenstein; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Surprise-induced blindness: a stimulus-driven attentional limit to conscious perception.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; J Jay Todd; A P Snyder; Christopher M Gilbert; René Marois
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Target-target similarity on the attentional blink: Task-relevance matters!

Authors:  Jocelyn L Sy; Barry Giesbrecht
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-03-20

6.  Repetition blindness is immune to the central bottleneck.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  The emotional attentional blink: what we know so far.

Authors:  Maureen McHugo; Bunmi O Olatunji; David H Zald
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The effects of incidentally learned temporal and spatial predictability on response times and visual fixations during target detection and discrimination.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; S Lee Hong; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Justin M Ericson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.