Literature DB >> 17972741

Repetition blindness is immune to the central bottleneck.

Paul E Dux1, René Marois.   

Abstract

The attentional blink (AB) and repetition blindness (RB) phenomena refer to subjects' impaired ability to detect the second of two different (AB) or identical (RB) target stimuli in a rapid serial visual presentation stream if they appear within 500 msec of one another. Despite the fact that the AB reveals a failure of conscious visual perception, it is at least partly due to limitations at central stages of information processing. Do all attentional limits to conscious perception have their locus at this central bottleneck? To address this question, here we investigated whether RB is affected by online response selection, a cognitive operation that requires central processing. The results indicate that, unlike the AB, RB does not result from central resource limitations. Evidently, temporal attentional limits to conscious perception can occur at multiple stages of information processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17972741     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits.

Authors:  E N McLaughlin; D I Shore; R M Klein
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-02

2.  Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; John Duncan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness.

Authors:  M M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Beyond similarity: masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink.

Authors:  T D Grandison; T G Ghirardelli; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-02

6.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

7.  Does mental rotation require central mechanisms?

Authors:  E Ruthruff; J Miller; T Lachmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval.

Authors:  L M Carrier; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Repetition blindness: out of sight or out of mind?

Authors:  Alison L Morris; Catherine L Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  6 in total

1.  The neural basis of temporal individuation and its capacity limits in the human brain.

Authors:  Claire K Naughtin; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Can attenuation of attentional blink also evoke removal of repetition blindness?

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The neural basis of temporal individuation and its capacity limits in the human brain.

Authors:  Claire K Naughtin; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Repetition blindness and repetition priming: effects of featural differences between targets and distractors on RSVP dual-target search.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Veronika Coltheart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

6.  T1 difficulty does not modulate the magnitude of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Hayley E P Lagroix; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.138

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.